this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

PC Gaming

230 readers
30 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 34 points 1 month ago (3 children)

DON'T RUSH IT.

Fuck's sake.

The current deck is more than enough to handle most games today. There is no reason to rush the next one out. Let the technology simmer for a while, reduce a little. Turn into a fantastic lightweight little belt buckle that connects to a pair of AR glasses and tracks my hand movements so I can play without holding a controller or mouse/keyboard anywhere I want.

[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Asking for a handheld the performance necessary to run a VR headset is too much

[–] taanegl 4 points 1 month ago

Maybe, depending upon how it is implemented.

If they somehow use those AMD NPU's as accelerators to handle spatial recognition, then it might be possible to at least add some of the needed functionality behind AR/VR without pounding the APU.

Or, considering it might be ARM, it might be an in-house or even AMD designed SoC with all the necessary bells and whistles to implement at the very least AR.

I'd buy the heck out of an AMD ARM device.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)