this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2024
32 points (100.0% liked)

Solarpunk

224 readers
4 users here now

The space to discuss Solarpunk itself and Solarpunk related stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere.

What is Solarpunk?

Join our chat: Movim or XMPP client.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With every solution, and even in the title of this newsletter itself, I emphasize the number one thing individuals can do that most of us are still not doing: talk about it! Use your voice to explain why climate change matters and to advocate for climate action.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rimu@piefed.social 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)
  • Don't have children
  • Don't build a house with concrete (incl foundation)
  • Public transport and cycling
  • No beef and minimize dairy products
[–] Teppichbrand@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Not having children is an interesting topic I'd like to know more about. Do you have any good talks or lectures about it? I mean, we are on this planet because life propagates, it's baked into the core of every living thing. I wouldn't say we have to have kids, but it's a driving force behind a lot of stuff that we do. And it is such a journey! I know kids emit co2, but to me, telling people not to have kids feels like giving up on hope and on life itself.
And I know earth is getting crowded, too. But the western world is not growing at all, other places do. So I'd say, let's make life over there better and safer, so families over there don't have to rely on children to look after them when the get old. Like Europe and the US did like a century ago.

[–] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I probably should have phrased it as "have less children" :)

My list was based on the book "How Bad Are Bananas" which goes into depth about the carbon emissions from various things, including children.

I'm not 100% sure that attributing the emissions of a child to their parents is correct 'accounting'. Maybe only their emissions until age 18? Still, all the emissions caused by that child and it's descendants would not have happened if it wasn't for the decision their parents made to create it. Accounted for this way, there is no doubt this is the most impactful decision someone in a developed country can make (that was the framing the OP used so I went with that) but it is not the most likely to happen, most practical or most moral option.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)