Star Trek
r/startrek: The Next Generation
Star Trek news and discussion. No slash fic...
Maybe a little slash fic.
New to Star Trek and wondering where to start?
Rules
1 Be constructive
All posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.
2 Be welcoming
It is important that everyone from newbies to OG Trekkers feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.
3 Be truthful
All posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.
4 Be nice
If a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.
5 Spoilers
Utilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episodes, as well as previews for upcoming episodes. There is no formal spoiler protection for episodes/films after they have been available for approximately one week.
6 Keep on-topic
All submissions must be directly about the Star Trek franchise (the shows, movies, books etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/quarks.
7 Meta
Questions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.
Upcoming Episodes
| Date | Episode | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 11-07 | LD 5x04 | "A Farewell to Farms" |
| 11-14 | LD 5x05 | "Starbase 80?!" |
| 11-21 | LD 5x06 | "Of Gods and Angels" |
| 11-28 | LD 5x07 | "Fully Dilated" |
| 12-05 | LD 5x08 | "Upper Decks" |
In Production
Strange New Worlds (2025)
Section 31 (2025-01-24)
Starfleet Academy (TBA)
In Development
Untitled comedy series
Wondering where to stream a series? Check here.
view the rest of the comments
One of the concerns I have with the Prime Directive is that it is intended to avoid a "slippery slope" problem, and so it is a very black-and-white rule. Starfleet can't protect a developing civilization from a catastrophic planet-ending disaster... and the core reason is that "interference" can be a bad thing, so we won't ever do it.
There are clearly situations where interference in another civilization would be immoral. There are also clearly situations where it would be moral. We can't possibly figure out those situations and enshrine them into law? We do better today! Homicide is illegal, but there are exceptions like self-defense, and there are mitigating circumstances like causing an accidental death.
The Prime Directive should be much more complex.
Might not make for great TV, though.
Yes and no. Building such a list of exceptions from general rule can be daunting if not impossible, because you may always get yourself in yet another situation that will need an exception and another, and you find yourself having law that is made of tons and tons of exceptions. I recall the episode where Picard was tasked to help to relocate some inhabitants of planets that was about to be colonized by a rase with a bloated law system and very strict about it. In my opinion this episode showed how such absolutely specific law coinsisting of tons of rules can be used against you. Furthermore moving in such law is also frustrating (we have currently lots of examples with idiotic laws that do not really work because of exceptions list). Like every law Prime DIrective works for "most cases" and just like normal law it is impossible to create it so it covers all possible outcoms and cases.
I dunno; ChatGPT can create a pretty reasonable list of exceptions in about a minute, and that's 21st century technology. 🤣
I'm not really arguing that it's this simple. What I'm suggesting is that our 21st century laws are complicated, nuanced, and of course, imperfect. Therefore 24th century law shouldn't be simple and dumb. The exceptions to the prime directive exist whether society preconceives them or not -- or else I missed the seasons where Kirk and Picard were thrown in prison.
ChatGPT Prompt: Considering the Prime Directive in the Star Trek universe, create a list of exceptional situations where it is morally preferable to interfere in the natural development of another species. Write it in a legal format.
Response:
PREAMBLE: In light of the Prime Directive of the United Federation of Planets' Starfleet, also known as Starfleet General Order 1, that forbids interference with the internal development of pre-warp civilizations, the following exceptions are hereby proposed. These exceptions are founded on moral arguments and an overarching belief in the sanctity of sentient life and the preservation of universal stability.
SECTION 1: IMMINENT EXTINCTION
1.1. In the event a civilization, pre-warp or otherwise, faces imminent extinction due to a natural disaster such as an asteroid impact, supernova, planetary tectonic instability, or catastrophic climate change, intervention may be morally justified to prevent the total eradication of that species.
1.2. This exception will apply only if the intervention does not fundamentally alter the civilization's cultural or societal development, and is limited to the bare minimum necessary to prevent extinction.
SECTION 2: EPIDEMIC/PANDEMIC SITUATIONS
2.1. If a civilization is facing a severe epidemic or pandemic situation, especially one that poses a threat to the survival of the entire species, intervention may be considered permissible to provide medical assistance, and introduce technologies or strategies for containment and eradication of the disease.
2.2. This exception must be applied cautiously, ensuring that the intervention does not lead to significant cultural, societal or technological changes beyond the necessary medical intervention.
SECTION 3: SELF-DESTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY
3.1. In the event a civilization develops a technology that is directly causing irreversible harm to its people or its planet's sustainability without the civilization's understanding of the consequences, intervention may be ethically acceptable to prevent self-destruction.
3.2. This exception should be applied only when the civilization shows no signs of independently correcting its course, and intervention should aim to minimise the impact on societal development.
SECTION 4: THIRD PARTY INTERFERENCE
4.1. If it is discovered that another warp-capable civilization is intervening or has intervened in a way that disrupts the natural development of a pre-warp civilization, interference may be morally justifiable to undo or mitigate the effects of such interference.
4.2. The scope of intervention should be limited to restoring the status quo prior to the third party interference, while minimizing any additional influence on the civilization's development.
SECTION 5: ENSLAVEMENT
5.1. If a pre-warp civilization is under the enslavement or subjugation of a warp-capable civilization, or under the threat of such subjugation, intervention may be morally acceptable to liberate the enslaved civilization and prevent future enslavement.
5.2. This exception will apply only if non-intervention would lead to substantial harm or extinction of the civilization, and efforts should be made to minimize cultural and societal disruption.
CLOSING REMARKS: It must be noted that these exceptions are not to be used as justifications for arbitrary interference. Any decision to intervene should be a last resort, guided by a comprehensive understanding of the possible consequences and a commitment to minimize disruption. In all cases, the Prime Directive's spirit of non-interference and respect for the self-determination and autonomy of other species should prevail.