this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2024
12 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
26 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The Supreme Court of Canada will review the case of a man who was arrested for drug and firearm offences after police encountered him at the scene of an overdose.

The top court's examination is expected to clarify application of the federal Good Samaritan Drug Overdose Act, passed to help reduce deaths from substance use.

In September 2020, Paul Eric Wilson was at the scene of a woman's fentanyl overdose in Vanscoy, Sask.

The judge's ruling said Wilson's overarching argument was that the search leading to the incriminating items and the subsequent charges was incidental to the first "prohibited" arrest.

Pierre Hawkins, legal counsel for John Howard Society, led the charge as an intervenor in Wilson's case.

"We see this as the court sending a strong message to both police forces about arresting people in these situations and about training officers in those cases," Hawkins said.


The original article contains 406 words, the summary contains 144 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Presently42@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

Care to provide a superior one?