Technology

37724 readers

56 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

231

YouTube is axing its ad-free Premium Lite subscription plan - The Verge (www.theverge.com)

submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Sibbo@sopuli.xyz to c/technology

70 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I was happily using this for a year or so now. Feels fairer than using an ad blocker. But now they apparently want more money out of people. Feels like some sort of internet video apocalypse is happening, where the services become extremely fragmented and expensive, like YouTube, netflix, hbo, Hulu, Disney+ and whatnot. Each wants some 10-20€ out of your pocket.

I guess that means back to ad blockers and piracy...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I really hope there is something like a flare system. You pay a fixed price every month, and that money gets distributed by watchtime or likes or so between creators. Including higher budget creations such as series and movies. Maybe depending on production budget, they can get a multiplier. Since a movie minute is usually a lot more expensive than a random guy talking into a microphone.

[–] relic_@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

YouTube already does that, though? In fact your premium sub helps creators much more than a non-premium viewer does. Of course the multiplier proposition would be new/different.

Not trying to shill for YouTube but that's one of the main reasons I have a subscription is to support creators I like.

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well true, but YouTube does not have all the content of the other streaming platforms, and also wants you to pay extra for e.g. movies.

[–] Sentinian@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

I'd imagine most people using YouTube aren't looking for TV/movie style content, rather the user created stuff. Or maybe TV shorter clips.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)