StrahdVonZarovich

joined 1 year ago
[–] StrahdVonZarovich 1 points 1 year ago

Wow you guys sound like very good friends. God bless!

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 1 points 1 year ago

Every game after Black and White is copy paste garbage, but everything before that is pretty damn good.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 3 points 1 year ago

Same. People like to call it a groundbreaking open world game when its exactly like all the others: a big world filled with the same few activities copy pasted over and over.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Perfectly stated. Having this new list of identities is extremely useful and helped me out a lot, but of course its gonna have problems. Trying to sort and categorize human beings is always a problem.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 1 points 1 year ago

Looking at images online and your description of it, it seems like the game in question.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 12 points 1 year ago

Its probably a common answer, but "Measure of a Man" from Star Trek: The Next Generation. It makes me hope for a future like that, where people can settle their problems by talking it out and debating, and even change their minds. Whenever I think about what Star Trek is really about, I think about Measure of a Man. Its such a shame Paramount's Picard show disrespected it so badly.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

In my opinion, trying to put titles and classifications on yourself can usually do more harm than good, and this is a good example why. For a little while I was scared that I wasnt "really bisexual" cause I slightly preferred feminine to masculine people. Then I realized that I shouldnt think about it too much and get stressed over things we all just made up, so now I just do what I want. It sucks that people use that "just a phase" argument, just let people live their lives.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Excuse my ignorance but what makes it annoying? And why is it bad that you now have a slight preference for girls?

(I assume you're an expert on this subject judging by your username, or you just like riding bicycles)

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why do you hate it? And I dont understand why some people apparently seem to alternate between what they like?

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 1 points 1 year ago

Although Pathfinder and 3.5e are very similar since Pathfinder was made to be a better 3.5e, they are still two different systems. You usually can't just take stuff from 3.5e and put it into Pathfinder, you need to convert it and change it. A lot of rules and subsystems have been changed, too much for me to go into in a comment. I would do some more research on it, but I would still suggest just sticking with Pathfinder.

[–] StrahdVonZarovich 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As a long time player of 3.5e and Pathfinder, I would go with Pathfinder. Although I love the aesthetics of 3.5e and that whole era, the balance changes that Pathfinder brought makes it more fun for everyone.

Yeah he was talking about a wild west themed "wandslinging" new area for Eberron, and now he's thinking about just making it its own thing. If anyone can make that idea work, its Keith Baker.

view more: ‹ prev next ›