this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
1083 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
12 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alcasa@lemmy.sdf.org 154 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All companies seem to be doing their best lately to cure us of our social media addiction.

[–] whatisallthis@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Back to videogame addiction it is boys!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] i_am_hiding@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm back on internet forums now. Screw the big companies.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] worfamerryman 90 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fediverse makes the internet feel more alive than ever.

It feels less mindless scrolling and more interaction.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 25 points 1 year ago

There are also discussions and (small) flame wars ☺️

Feels like 'back in the day' where everything was a bit wonky but people could actually help eachother (and not being nudge nudge nudged all the time to be distracted by something else).

[–] exododo@leminal.space 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The illusion of infinite growth on "free use" ad based business dies when investment funds demand more benefits from former startups now turned into corporations whose only asset of value is the their users' data. You are the product, so it's time to squeeze you.

I think such data is currently overvalued on a overgrown ad-targeting market with too many competitors, and adding more ads only devaluates each ad value further, because users' consuming capacity also has a limit. So I see a severe correction coming. Another bubble burst, and another crisis inside the crisis that late capitalism itself is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Phen@lemmy.eco.br 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That's one part of how the internet dies, there are others. For example: soon the vast majority of the content on the internet will have been created by bots (AI or not). Or even by malicious folks pushing narratives.

TLDR: not only the internet is becoming more annoying to use it is also constantly becoming less useful with worse content replacing everything that was ever good

And the problem with content created by bots is that it is usually made to not look like that was the case. Sometimes that's not the problem like some random site with information about a video game can have all of its content generated automatically based on data extracted from that game. That is fine.

But other cases, specially with AI content, can be much worse. There was a recent example where some site with history content had generated some pages using an AI and that AI created a page about Scimitars which included information taken from Dungeons and Dragons, but presented then as historic facts.

And the main problem here is that the internet feeds on itself. Texts are copied from one site to another by non-AI bots. Some text created by AI in one site gets copied to multiple threads on reddit, hacker news, stack overflow, 4chan and all sorts of places. Places that are scanned by search engines and often picked as preferred search results by users.

Then Google these days try everything to make a larger profit from you. That includes "stealing" content from inside websites to display on top of the search results page - so that you never click away from the Google site. In order to do that more efficiently, they give preference to sites that allow this behavior over sites with actual better search results. Try googling "country in Africa with the letter K".

So in the end all your search results will soon be stuff that was written by AI. And remember: AI doesn't think. It won't ever do. AI is just a robot role-playing as human.

When you see a comedian doing a Stephen Hawking impression, you don't expect them to publish scientific papers, in fact you don't pay any attention to what they actually say, because you know it'll either be rubbish or just a repeat of something that Hawking had said before. AI is the same thing. It'll never be intelligent, it'll only get better at imitating humans, by looking at what humans say. And with their content taking over the internet, it'll soon be imitating itself.

And the only memory of the golden years of the internet, will maybe be Wikipedia. Have you donated to them yet? Think about how many times you've used it and remember it has never shown an ad other than their pleas for donation. Please consider giving them a few bucks when you've some to spare.

[–] 257m@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I think the solution is to just return to the old web https://thewebisfucked.com/

[–] mindlight@lemm.ee 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

While there are a billion things Google does that annoys me I'm not able to figure out how to create and maintain a video streaming platform without ads or paywall that finances both creation and the providing material.

I mean, who are the competitors and how do they finance it if not in a similar way?

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'd argue Youtube was better when creators weren't paid and people were just having genuine fun. The internet used to be free and filled with content by people with passion. Much like users and the current state of the fediverse.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

I really just hate the "influencer culture" it spawned, and every idiot trying to emulate that meta instead of just making content.

[–] Makeshift@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can absolutely understand that point of view and even agree to an extent.

However, as a counterpoint: creative people being able to support themselves with their work means they can focus on their art instead of it just being a side hobby to their money making job

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, but then you get channels like Linus Tech Tips where it became less about product reviews and just about volume production garbage content and forced contraversial content to keep revenue stream.

[–] AngryMob@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You also get countless other smaller channels that are just large enough to have youtube be their primary income, but small enough where they stay true to their original intent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hexorg 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You bring a great point I hadn’t considered before. Only people with passion for something will do it for free while many more people with so that for cash. Though it’s interesting to see that cash doesn’t make passionate people’s content better it just makes more mediocre content.

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Well, people with a passion also want to do what they do for a living.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Iceblade02@lemdit.com 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Proferring it as ToS violation is actually quite concerning for anyone using the same google account for their primary email and as a youtube account'

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GeekFTW@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Dear Youtube,

I've been using you daily since before you were bought by Google. I have watched undoubted millions of youtube videos over the last 17 years.

The mother fucking nanosecond you start blocking me from watching your content because I have an ad blocker is the moment I sit here and just rip every each and every single mother fucking video I want to watch to view entirely offline. Given you've tried and failed for a decade now to stop us from doing that I trust it'll solve both our needs, you won't have me blocking your ads, and I won't need to ever see em. Savvy? Savvy!

With a level of spite indescribable,

Me.

Edit: For those whining about my entitlement: QQ more idc.

Edit 2: Ya'll still commenting and downvoting a week later while I haven't thought about any of you at all lmao. Rent free!

[–] imPastaSyndrome@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I mean... 'oh no a person who doesn't watch our ads is going to not watch our ads'

Not sure they'll care about the 'loss''

[–] Kichae@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Now it's "a person who doesn't watch our ads isn't using up bandwidth"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baggins 10 points 1 year ago

undoubted millions of youtube videos over the last 17 years

4 million would be just over 644 videos watched every single day for each one of those 17 years.

I salute your dedication.

[–] hibbfd@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

I'm having a bad, bad, day

It's about time that I get my way

Streaming whatever I see

oh, indescribable me

I’m having a bad, bad, day

If you block my ad blocker that's not okay

Watch, this is so fun to see

oh, indescribable me

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.mindoki.com 25 points 1 year ago

Drink verification can.

[–] skycat 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will continue to use ublock and let Google lose money in the process I don't mind. In fact I'm all for it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rubanski@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Please drink a verification can

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RVMWSN@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Mastodon exploded when Elon took over Twitter. Lemmy exploded when Reddit changed it's api rules. I think the problem is not that YouTube doesn't fuck things up, because they often do. Perhaps the alternatives are not good enough for early majority to migrate. We need more early adopters to migrate ASAP. (I'm thinking of PeerTube, but perhaps Odyssee has beter changes at the moment)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NumbersCanBeFun@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

I’m on vacation for the next two weeks. I only really need to log into Google for work. I got proton mail subscription and I’ve been moving all my personal stuff to that slowly. I’m going to finish it off and just cut Google out completely for personal use.

[–] utopify_org@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Quick! Let's move all Youtube channels to the fediverse (PeerTube), before people are getting conditioned to another sick behavior created by rich people.

[–] DestroyMegacorps@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Now there forcing people who have their watch history off to turn back it on

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LongPigFlavor@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I miss YouTube Vanced, it had better UI and more features than the official app. I pay for premium and I like it and all, but I wish they could've adopted some features from Vanced instead of monetizing previously free features such as background play.

[–] beneeney@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Have you tried ReVanced? It's just as good if not better

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

I don't really know how people can expect YouTube to exist without some sort of income.

The age of free content is coming to a close as VC funds dry up. Serving video is expensive.

In reaction to this news from YouTube, I signed up for Premium. $12/mo for my main source of content? Easy decision.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (17 children)

Thats more than most streaming services cost..l

And youtube doesnt create the content.. lol

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Ser_Salty@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I had no problems back when it was one skippable ad for laundry detergent and a banner for a deal on Xbox games at an electronics store. But the ads have just gotten so scummy, with some just being actual scams, it's become a matter of security and not having my brain rotted away by disgusting mobile ads full of diarrhea, piss, dead babies and foot fungus scraping. At this point Premium isn't a nice to have ad-less alternative, it's a protection racket.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Sure, but it isn't one ad anymore. it is two upfront, plus ads in the comment portion, plus random ads in between. The actual youtube app (without premium) is horrendous and I don't blame people for using ad blocker or newpipe, vancetube etc

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Vilian@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

no, just use firefox with ublock

[–] PuppyOSAndCoffee@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

The proxy wars begun again they have

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As part of a general trend, yeah it looks that way. But, this is just YouTube. It's a big part of the web, but it's not the web, and definitely not the internet. It sounds like there's already ways around it though so for the type of folks who would have ad blocked I don't see a lot changing, which does make me wonder the point of this is though.

[–] beirut_bootleg@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

I don't completely mind. This is a boon to platforms like Nebula and CuriosityStream, which I think respect creators more with revenue and users with no ads. Sure it's not free but there are no shennanigans like this.

[–] TheDankHold@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I get that we all think entertainment products should be free but in a capitalist economy server space costs money. To deliver and maintain petabytes of data takes vast resources and in our society, those resources cost money. They keep it running through direct payment or auctioning ad space. So if you don’t want to get premium then they still need to pay for the upkeep of the service you’re using for free. Thus ads.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't speak for everyone, but I'd be happy to share the burden of seeding these videos, if they'd stop threatening us over it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linoor 7 points 1 year ago

The problem is that when you pay them they still track you and still sell your data.

load more comments (1 replies)

It's been ages since I have entered the youtube.com domain, I use the libredirect extension to go to invidious instances. Sometimes the instances are blocked and I have to try another one but its a small price to pay for internet freedom. Still, google is trying to sue invidious for using their API, which they don't, they just scrape the website, but I would like to see the bullshit google comes out with.

[–] radau@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago

I used to think people who downloaded videos on YouTube, forum posts with guides or useful info and other data were weird.

They were right.

With archive.org under threat some of it will be gone for good unfortunately. Save what you can when you can it might not be there later.

[–] N00b22@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Firefox 116, that popup hasn't showed up for me... for now

[–] arf_arf@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago

No one here considers that we might not need a "competitor" for YouTube at all. Videos have been a disaster for the web. Information that can easily be relayed and digested in a 1000-word article is instead stretched into a 30-40 minute video with ad breaks. The less aid about TikTok, Instagram, and other bullshit video platforms the best. We don't need this shit. We need to go back to Web 1.0. Web as a means to share information and talk to people. There's no room for ShitTube there.

[–] Laticauda@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is hardly the first time this sort of thing has happened. We'll probably just figure out another workaround like we have many times in the past.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›