this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2024
180 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17984 readers
1 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Gaywallet
alyaza
180
A backdoor in xz (current versions are impacted) (lwn.net)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by brie to c/foss
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

TL;DR: Update immediately, especially if SSH is enabled. xz versions 5.6.0 & 5.6.1 are impacted. The article contains links to each distro's specific instructions of what to do.

https://news.opensuse.org/2024/03/29/xz-backdoor/

Current research indicates that the backdoor is active in the SSH Daemon, allowing malicious actors to access systems where SSH is exposed to the internet.

In summary, the conditions for exploitation seem to be:

  • xz version 5.6.0 or 5.6.1
  • SSH with a patch that causes xz to be loaded
  • SSH daemon enabled

Impact on distros

  • Arch Linux: Backdoor was present, but shouldn't be able to activate. Updating is still strongly recommended.

  • Debian: Testing, Unstable, and Experimental are affected (update to xz-utils version 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1). Stable is not affected.

  • Fedora: 41 is affected and should not be used. Fedora 40 may be affected (check the version of xz). Fedora 39 is not affected.

  • FreeBSD: Not affected.

  • Kali: Affected.

  • NixOS: NixOS unstable has the backdoor, but it should not be able to activate. NixOS stable is not affected.

  • OpenSUSE: Tumbleweed and MicroOS are affected. Update to liblzma5 version 5.6.1.revertto5.4. Leap is not affected.

CVE-2024-3094

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] youRFate@feddit.de 25 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

FYI: if you run freebsd you are not affected: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-security/2024-March/000248.html

Took me a while to find out so I thought I’d share.

[–] brie 5 points 8 months ago

Thanks, edited this into the post (along with the distros listed by LWN)

[–] viking 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The story about this backdoor is really wild if it's true https://lcamtuf.substack.com/p/technologist-vs-spy-the-xz-backdoor

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] furrowsofar 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (3 children)

Why ssh? Does ssh use xz?

[–] jack@monero.town 14 points 8 months ago

Ssh uses systemd and systemd uses lzma (xz)

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 12 points 8 months ago

Not directly, but it's often integrated with systemd which does.

What may not be clear is the connection to SSH. And it’s a trip. Many Linux distros patch sshd to add systemd features, and libsystemd pulls the liblzma library. That means the liblzma initialization code gets run when sshd starts.

https://hackaday.com/2024/03/29/security-alert-potential-ssh-backdoor-via-liblzma/

[–] outbound@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 months ago

Yes. ssh's RSA encryption uses liblzm.

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Im new to Linux does this include linux mint since it is based on Debian?

[–] termus 11 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Likely not since most of these are dev or experimental of the latest version.

Check xz --version

If you're not on the two listed above you're fine.

[–] brie 8 points 8 months ago

As far as I can tell running xz directly should be fine, but for the extra paranoid check the version of the xz-utils package. If it is safe, it will be either less than 5.6.0, or it should be 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1 (xz 5.4.5 with a spoof version number to ensure compromised systems get the update).

[–] Gamers_Mate@kbin.social 3 points 8 months ago

awesome thanks I did (xz --version) to check and it is using an unaffected version.

[–] Kissaki 6 points 8 months ago (1 children)

This analysis has some technical information on how it injects itself, conditionally, into deb and rpm from src tar.

[–] jarfil 3 points 8 months ago

Holy c... that's quite a writeup, and what a rat's nest of an exploit. A long time ago, I used to know some reverse engineering, then I got an eval $zrKcTy to the got.plt.

Wonder what it turns out to have been doing.

[–] jarfil 1 points 8 months ago

WSL2 2.1.5:

  • (system) CBL-Mariner / Azure Linux: xz-libs 5.2.5-1.cm2
  • Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS: xz-utils 5.2.5-2ubuntu1
  • Kali (rolling): Same fix as for Debian Testing (update to xz-utils version 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1)