I see, unfortunate
Don't think that is compatible with GDPR, or?
That is still not sourcing to specific claims made in the article, just pointing to a reporter, which is not how sourcing works. There is a certain paranoia on this board, at no point did I say I disagreed with the claims made, just that it isn't a news article
So I could just post a number of news outlets and call it news? Just post a link to the frontpage of the guardian? The post itself even refers to previous posts as "discussion". The bulk of the "article" is unsourced so I don't even know how you determined this as news.
So a thought I had, does this kind of reasoning extend to western sources talking about western issues? I think a lot of people would agree on the principle of scepticism towards sources originating from places with a completely different political climate, so extending that to include many different political leanings and not only orientalism, would be a lot easier for people to stomach. As I said, just a thought
I was thinking the same, thought about checking out lemmy.world since it seems like it has a pretty big capacity for new members
Apparently you can't according to the people over at lemmygrad
Marxism-Leninism, a lot of people on the lemmygrad sub use ML for short
Guess we all know what the .ml is referring to now
Search for lemmy_support and it should turn up (if you're an lemmy.ml)
You could try asking that question in Lemmy support community, I'm just a random user xD
The summer offensive that has been going on for what? One week? Looking at how fast Russia gained ground in bakhmut, vuhledar, and avdiivka, this offensive is going swimmingly