nnachtigal

I did because oft W10 / W11 changes

Ein Bart ist das Makeup des Mannes. Versteckt super die Falten um den Mund und das Doppelkinn oder die Speckmasse die den theoretisch vorhandenen Hals verdeckt.

XMPP/Jabber mit Omemo Verschlüsselung ist dezentral und Ende-zu-Ende verschlüsselt. Conversations ist da n recht guter Client :-)

Ich kann die App auch nicht finden..

Might need fixing though. In 3D view there are 2 buildings on top of each other. The stuff that I did, and then the basic structure. So I guess the other thing would need to be deleted?

This is what I am proud of. I didn't map the original outline of the building, but I did the different building parts including heights for 3D view, entrances, the tunnel through the building and the courtyard.

I agree. I found this post useful regarding to why: https://infosec.pub/post/400702

Hier ist ein guter Post dazu: https://infosec.pub/post/400702

Wenn ich mir anschaue, was aus anderen Projekten geworden ist, bei denen große Firmen mitgewirkt haben (zB XMPP), komme ich nicht zu dem Schluss, dass von erhalten die Rede sein kann. Ich persönlich bin ganz klar fürs deföderieren gegenüber Threads oder anderen Instanzen, die von bekannten Datenkraken betrieben werden.

Warum schwimmen die Opis auf gigantischen Eicheln aus denen ein Bändchen rausguckt?

Thanks. Yeah, i thought about using bollard as description, too. It just also doesn't really fit the description. Bollards are apparently pillar-shaped obstacles only. Cycle barrier seems to fit best. Per definition also "single" seems to fit best here. I am still a bit bothered by the difference of the picture and scheme from what I would understand as "single cycle barrier", namely a single barrier. Maybe there could be two or even three options - two sided (path in the middle), one sided (path left or right) and center ( path left and right).

Hm! Description sounds fitting. But why does it say "single" when there are barriers on both sides in the picture and the schematic illustration?