From my other comment:
The largest in the South East of Western Australia is the Western Green Energy Hub which could generate 50GW of wind and solar energy and use that to produce 3.5m tonnes of green hydrogen every year. It will take several more years before a final investment decision is made and another decade to construct, but that's the nature of large scale projects.
You need electricity to make hydrogen.
Indeed. There's a number of huge solar farms in the development / approval phase in Western Australia.
The largest in the South East of Western Australia is the Western Green Energy Hub which could generate 50GW of wind and solar energy and use that to produce 3.5m tonnes of green hydrogen every year. It will take several more years before a final investment decision is made and another decade to construct, but that's the nature of large scale projects.
I don't know how real the transportation problems actually are. Australia is already exporting liquid hydrogen. The industry doesn't seem concerned about it.
You're going to have to explain how green hydrogen is a scam because I'm not going to listen to an obscure podcast to try to understand your point.
It's not all bad news.
West Aus is getting big into renewable hydrogen. Basically using solar farms to crack hydrogen from sea water.
Last time I read up about it there were three new cracking facilities under development.
The whole process seems so magical to me as a non-science person, basically selling sun & sea water as a form of energy that for all intents and purposes has no waste products.
what exactly makes him think he’ll be spared?
I don't really know anything about this but... the article says he acknowledges that his own companies are prominent greenhouse gas emitters, he is investing $6b to improve his companies, and that he has large investments in renewables as well.
IDK how true that is, but thats what it says.
Amaze!
Well done!
That's not really possible because there's no way to know which instance to direct someone to. No point directing them to an instance where they don't have an account.
Also I don't think showing buttons like upvote which just redirect to another page is a good UX at all.
Just lemmy.
It just pulls comments from a lemmy post.
a lemmy post along with its comments can become static content on a static web page of your choice
This isn't quite right. The "static web page" (the pre-rendered page) doesn't include the Lemmy post or comments. When your browser renders the static page, the browser will then pull down the lemmy comments.
It's going to continue to work, it's just going to be either paid or ad supported.
Just because a particular service was previously provided for no additional charge, does not mean it has to be so in perpetuity, given that the vast majority of subscribers aren't using the service any longer.
Yeah this is a way better solution than disqus or something. Lots of potential.
I am ideologically opposed to this form of advertising.
Commercial enterprises can do what they want but I don't think it's at all appropriate for a public institution.
This stinks.