jasory

Basically in-depth computer science knowledge; graph theory, automata, aspects of system programming.

I technically have a physics background coupled with a bit of self-study of pure mathematics. But those 3 categories I feel hold me back in application (in physics primarily, I don't do real software development).

This blog covers a lot of topics, but very superficially.

This blog covers a lot of topics, but very superficially.

Hmmm... yes Robert Evans the anarkiddie who tried to cite examples of business owners trapping customers in burning buildings to argue that incident response should be discarded in favor of a grass roots response and recovery mission by locals.

Robert Evans is blatantly biased and by his own admission actively participated in the "Rose City Antifa". He's literally the left-wing Andy Ngo, and equally brain-dead. But he has a nice voice so people still listen.

Sure but what degree of influence is actually "radicalising" or a point of concern?

We like to pretend that by banning extreme communities we are saving civilisation from them. But the fact is that extreme groups are already rejected by society. If your ideas are not actually somewhat adjacent to already held beliefs, you can't just force people to accept them.

I think a good example of this was the "fall" of Richard Spencer. All the leftist communities (of which I was semi-active in at the time) credited his decline with the punch he received and apparently assumed that it was the act of punching that resulted in his decline, and used it to justify more violent actions. The reality is that Spencer just had a clique of friends that the left (and Spencer himself) interpreted as wide support and when he was punched the greater public didn't care because they never cared about him.

"A deradicalising effect"

I'm sorry what? The idea that smaller communities are somehow less radical is absurd.

I think you are unaware (or much more likely willfully ignoring) that communities are primarily dominated by a few active users, and simply viewed with a varying degree of support by non-engaging users.

If they never valued communities enough to stay with them, then they never really cared about the cause to begin with. These aren't the radicals you need to be concerned about.

"And those people diffuse back into the general population"

Because that doesn't happen to a greater degree when exposed to the "general population" on the same website?

You're literally on a platform that was created to harbor extremist groups. Look at who Dessalines is, (aka u/parentis-shotgun) and their self-proclaimed motivation for writing LemmyNet. When you ban people from a website, they just move to another place, they are not stupid it's pretty easy to create websites. It's purely optical, you're not saving civilisation from harmful ideas, just preventing yourself from seeing it.

Some people (like myself and other scientists/mathematicians), write software for specific fields so if you follow them you find it out what work they are putting out, and issues they find in other software etc.

You could write bindings to machine-prime . Hardly anything challenging for an actual programmer, but I'll take the free labor if it is available.

Wrote a basic primality checker library, it's not by far my most interesting or complex project but I like that I accomplished all my initial goals in a timely fashion.

If you've spent any time on the "dark web" this is super-obvious. They all love encryption, and most software developers are completely incompetent when it comes to encryption so backdooring an app is trivial. Hell, even well-known crypto libraries have implementations that rely on clearly false assumptions.

"Arab spring ..." So you cite an example of social activism that disastrously failed (by your own admission) to justify a similar action by your hand?

Even then it doesn't disprove that individuals that contribute more are statistically more likely to be noticed when absent. If you want to have an impact, especially a positive one, it helps to not have anger as your sole motivator.

"So there is no ruling class"

What exactly is a ruling class to you? There will always be a deciding group. Even in anarcho-fantasies that rule by consensus there will always be a small group that refuses to negotiate, they become the ruling class in that circumstance. So do they get deported to an archipelago for refusing to come to a consensus? Don't the deporters become the ruling class then?

Any sort of organized society outside of intimate groups needs some sort of hierarchical decision making. It's one thing to advocate for positions to be more logically allocated, and another to be completely destroyed.

"Don't put words in my fucking mouth"

I'm impressed that you aren't apparently a hypocrite by holding others to a logical standard that you don't follow. Unfortunately that logical standard is that being angry justifies spreading textual diarrhea all over Lemmy.