KrimsonBun

joined 3 years ago
[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

it's not really that necessary though, who cares

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

didn't see that one coming

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

You're acting like we aren't working around this, like if non-profits and charities don't exist. We can complain and fight these people while also working around their crap of a system. Is the struggle worth it? Don't know, don't care.

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

if porn is banned then there's no regulation for it, meaning when people inevitably set up illegal porn sites things like child porn and abuse are not off the table and will be much easier to find than right now. unless of course you want to implement mass survailance to make sure nobody's watching, which is a violation of our human right to privacy.

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

depends on the way it's implemented but yeah in some cases that'd be nice

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 50 points 1 year ago

Maybe the real chatbots are the friends we made along the way

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

I wouldn't be surprised if this is fake, I wouldn't be surprised if it was real. Either way fuck the "DPR"K

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Well it's better if the sponsor is ineffective, that way the LMG still gets money for the incredible work they're doing and the silly little corp sponsoring them is losing money. It's a win win.

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this firefox is so hardened it won't even let you see what you search

[–] KrimsonBun@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

yeah just completely dismiss the other part it isn't important at all

view more: ‹ prev next ›