this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
30 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
21 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive.is link, if you hit a paywall: https://archive.ph/RF9jn

Democratic candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. gets his first national town hall with NewsNation, as the media grapples with another conspiratorial candidate. “There’s a difference between giving him a town hall and just covering his candidacy,” one network executive says.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Honestly, could we ignore him? He's a fringe candidate with a near-zero chance of reaching nomination. What impact does he have on the race other than to act as a potential spoiler and distraction candidate?

[–] alyaza 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, could we ignore him?

we can, but obviously that's not going to make much of a difference if the media doesn't--and quite a lot of media outlets seem to be refusing to just ignore him. RFK Jr also has quite an audience already and promotes extremely harmful viewpoints, so the extent to which ignoring him is useful is, i think, debatable on some grounds. it may or may not be a good idea to let him spout anti-vaccine rhetoric unchecked.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

My concern is based on what happened with Trump. The more we debated him in 2016, and the more he was criticized in the media, the more his profile grew.

Of course the media won't do the sensible thing- Where's the profit incentive in that?

But perhaps by being indifferent instead of outraged, we'll not encourage them to write quite so much about him.

[–] tburkhol 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Trump, and I think RFK jr, appeal to anti-establishment people. When the establishment media criticize them, it validates their anti-establishment credentials.

Media like them because they're controversial, and controversy drives engagement. I'm sure they see RFK jr as the 'left wing' Trump and great for the bottom line.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 2 points 1 year ago

The one thing we can do, maybe, is to not engage. Try not to think about him.

We should have tried that with Trump.

[–] circularfish 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You'll remember that few weeks back, Joe Rogan challenged vaccine researcher Peter Hotez to debate RFK on his podcast.

When Hotez rightfully refused (I mean, what is the point of debating a pigeon), Elon Musk couldn't resist piling on -- accusing Hotez of being "scared" of debate. Cue the hooting across the bird site. (The whole thing reminded me of that scene with the apes at the beginning of 2001: A Space Odyssey, but I digress).

Anyhoo, the whole Rogan-Hotez-Musk episode, aside from being a low point in U.S. social-scientific discourse, raises all sorts of questions about how deeply one engages kookiness.

I tend to fall into the "laugh and ignore" camp because scientific truth can never be settled by who yells the loudest, and ... again, pigeons ... but there is a lot of room for nuance in determining the best way to combat misinformation. Particularly among populations in a position to be hurt by it. (anti-VAX nonsense and the elderly being a prime example).

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think giving a platform to ignorance debunks it. The people likely to be hornswoggled aren't going to listen to the expert.

[–] TechyDad 4 points 1 year ago

And there's the problem that falsehoods are quick and easy to produce but can take time and effort to debunk.

In the time it takes you to debunk one claim, the anti-vaxxer can spew a dozen more. For you to win, you need to debunk everything they say. For them to win, they just need to keep spewing garbage with no evidence until you run out of time to debunk.

[–] Radioaktvt@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

I really feel as though this new age of the Internet has given rise to allowing any self important asshole with money the ability to perpetrate lies and feed the beast of propaganda. Anytime I hear someone even mention Joe Rogan I immediately know they’re going to spew some idiotic viewpoints without any significant merit as well as making it impossible to refute their viewpoint. It’s veiled intellectualism.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't care if a candidate's chances are low. The content of what he has to say is why I want to ignore him.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 1 points 1 year ago

Hopefully if we ignore him, the media won't amplify him quite as much.

[–] CarrierLost@lemmy.one 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Distraction is the purpose. Modern media has gone all in on clickbait and sensationalism leading to the rise of film and TV “star” candidates.

It’s awful.

[–] CrimsonOnoscopy 4 points 1 year ago

It's frankly been the trend of all privately-owned media to be like this, since the inception of Capitalism.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 1 year ago

It is obvious why he is running and why NewsNation is giving him a town hall. RFK Jr. has only gotten three party endorsements; Bernie got more and better ones.

He should be treated as someone who isn't going to win.

[–] Banzai51@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just because someone has something to say, doesn't mean the rest of us HAVE to listen.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

But how else are the masses going to learn that 5G is unzipping their DNA and inserting ATCG sequences that compose troll face gifs?

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Michael Smerconish gave RFK Jr. a handjob on national television. It was frankly shocking to stumble across live.

It’s interesting how Smerconish restyled himself as a moderate, after being one of Limbaugh’s guest hosts in the ‘90s.

[–] rustyspoon 2 points 1 year ago

RFK Jr. was interested in politics at a very young age

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I will be honest I'm out of the loop on this guy. Is he running left of Bernie and Jill Stine? Because that sure seems like a poor plan. The Democrats are not like the Republican primaries where they have to out extreme right until the general election.

[–] TechyDad 13 points 1 year ago

He's an anti-vaxxer that echos a lot of Russian propaganda. He even tweeted an image of a woman wearing his campaign merchandise - and then people noticed that the sign on the cafe in the background was in Russian.

If anything, he seems like a right-winger trying to pretend that he's a liberal and hoping that people vote for him based on his famous family name.