this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

73 readers
6 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] frog 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sunak needs to go in the opposite direction: extend inheritance tax to the super wealthy, who typically hide their assets offshore and in trusts in order to avoid inheritance tax (amongst others). About 4% of people pay inheritance tax: essentially the top 2-5%. The 1% don't pay any.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sunak needs to go in the opposite direction: extend inheritance tax to the super wealthy, who typically hide their assets offshore and in trusts in order to avoid inheritance tax (amongst others).

You've just described his family.

[–] frog 12 points 1 year ago

Yep. I kind of wish that having those kind of tax arrangements automatically disqualified someone from being a politician. Not paying UK tax? You can't be part of the UK's government. Won't happen, though.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How does money get "off shore" in the first place?

Can't they implement stupid taxes on any money leaving the country? Like 25-50% or something?

[–] frog 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I understand it (and conceding that my knowledge is somewhat limited - I have a background in accountancy but all my clients were SME's, who don't use these schemes) it's done through a combination of limited companies, shell companies, and trusts. The assets all get moved around in such a way that the super wealthy technically don't own their own stuff anymore. They just own the company that owns the company that owns the assets, with one or more of the companies being registered in a tax haven rather than the UK, so that UK taxes don't apply.

A decent government with sufficient backbone to stand up to the wealthy would close down loopholes like that, ensuring the assets are taxed when they "leave" the UK or taxing the owners regardless of whether they use a tax haven or not. It won't happen, because neither of the main parties have the courage to stand up to the super rich.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I would love to see someone grow a spine and ban that overseas cop out. Shareholder companies should owning property should pay a tax rated at its value. It is used too much just to dodge tax and inheritances.

[–] frog 2 points 1 year ago

I would love to see that too! I'd also like to see capital gains and dividends taxes equalised with income tax - although these taxes were intended to encourage investment, the actual effect has been for the wealthy to essentially claim their income they get from working is actually capital gains or dividends, thus paying less tax. Plus there's not a lot of evidence that lower taxes on dividends and capital gains boosts investment anyway.

[–] stsquad@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

We had money controls in the 70s but it basically led to poor inward investment and expats waiting for a change of government before coming back to the UK. Why move capital into a country you're not sure you can take it out afterwards.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You have to be claiming ~~£1M~~ £500k before you start paying inheritance tax for a direct family member. Remembering most of the time any value that is bequeathed is shared, it is easy to see why only 5% pay inheritance tax. There will be a lot more above those who simply dodge it by going offshore. Restrictions need tightening on inheritance tax not removing imo. Offshoring property needs to be banned outright.

EDIT amount was wrong. It is £1m that you can claim if you are married. £500k for direct family and £375k for everyone else.

[–] YungOnions@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The threshold for inheritance tax in the UK is £325,000.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I have changed it with an edit. I need to check youtubers statement more. The amount was lifted to £500k for direct family members this year.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That can't be right I've paid inheritance tax on my parents earnings and it definitely wasn't 1 million pounds. I'd have noticed.

[–] Syldon@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

I have changed it with an edit. I need to check youtubers statement more. The amount was lifted to £500k for direct family members this year.