this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
715 points (100.0% liked)

Firefox

449 readers
17 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Niceee, Firefox Android needs more attention. It's such an underrated browser. It's non chromium, search bar on bottom by default, uBlock Origin, https-only mode, cookie banner reduction (soon), the best reader mode of all browsers, and addon support.

[–] Noahv@kbin.social 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the reason why I use Firefox on Android.

[–] kratoz29@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the reason why I might start to use FF again (tbh at this point I don't see why to use anything else).

[–] Camilo@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I am using Firefox as well and I don't think I'd go back to Chrome, but I wish it supported progressive web apps a bit better!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] oranges@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Glad I made the switch back to FireFox a year or two ago. As a Dev, I was entrenched in Chrome and it wasn't an easy move but with the path Google are currently treading around ad serving, blocking the ad blocks etc. I feel I made the right choice.....

[–] arc@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I use Firefox on Android and it's great. Ad blocking is the big one but it's just a good browser. I deleted the Twitter and Reddit apps recently and Firefox lets me bookmark the sites on the launcher so it's like a separate "app" but not taking up 100s MB of space and I can block ads on these sites. I'm hoping that I'll be to use the Twitter desktop extension that prunes even more junk out of the experience - recommendations, what's trending and other clickbait garbage

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you have anything installed to make them stop bugging you about using their awful apps?

I think the ublock annoyances list should help with those.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yoz@aussie.zone 49 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] Knusper@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago

They don't spell this out, but my interpretation is that extension devs will be able to publish extensions for use on Android, without Mozilla explicitly approving each one of them.

Many desktop extensions work as-is on Android, so when this goes live, we'll likely see dozens, if not hundreds, of extensions becoming available in the following weeks.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] keenkoon@lemm.ee 32 points 1 year ago

this is huge!

[–] EeeDawg101@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Woah that’s awesome. So ublock origin on android Firefox? Freaking nice!

[–] IgnacioM@lemmy.ml 122 points 1 year ago

uBlock on Firefox mobile has been out for a while now

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

you can use ublock origin on android firefox right now.. been using it for years.

[–] maketheworldcute@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

I use it since maybe a year now on Android and it's amazing. The toggeling of the overlay and weird zap objects/overlays function takes some getting used too but otherwise its just like on the Desktop.

[–] antony@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

This is great news, I've just switched to Firefox & Firefox Focus on Android as a longtime user of Mobile Chrome and Desktop Firefox. It always felt weak on mobile, but things have changed. Still hating the purple though, and the placement of the new tab button but that's a small price to pay.

[–] Templa 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm already using extensions on Android with Firefox Nightly but yeah I guess that's nice

[–] lolgcat@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah it's been nice but it has come with a bit of a learning curve. The process now is much more straightforward. Maybe devs will be more inclined to build since the userbase has future.

[–] gamey@feddit.rocks 11 points 1 year ago

So we finally get some major functionality back? I never cared about that redisgn but removing proper extension support was a really shitty part of it that I did care about!

[–] focalors@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Nice, no more nightly and beta for me...

[–] bet@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

If this comes through, I might no longer need Iceraven (andoid firefox with full addon support, like before they tore it out; I use it for Singlefile)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] starman@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It was already possible to use all extensions on Firefox for Android Nightly

[–] Black_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But it was not an activity that an ordinary person was willing to spend time on doing.

[–] starman@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

That's also true

[–] ChristianWS@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Alright, so what extensions are you guys looking forward to? On mobile I don't think about it too much cause most of the websites I use on Desktop I use as apps on Android, so a couple of website specific extensions are useless for me

[–] longdarkfantasy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Redirect amp to html, search by image, clear urls, localCDN, web archives, tampermonkey etc.🫡 So many useful extensions.

[–] shadeless@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sponsor Block (+ the already existing uBlock origin) for an ad-free YouTube.

Currently using the fennec build Firefox with those add-ons and have since ditched the YouTube app. Works great so far as an ad-free/native alternative to apps like revanced or newpipe

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, whoop.

Let me fucking download my files to where I want to on mobile, goddamnit.

[–] eco@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

Android has locked down free access to storage in recent versions. Blame Google.

[–] 52fighters@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Does this mean that I'll be able to get temporary containers on Firefox Android?

[–] blue_penquin@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some parts of the container API is not available on Android unfortunately. No container extension will work until that is fixed.

https://github.com/stoically/temporary-containers/issues/465

https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1807456

[–] Knusper@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

That extension requires rather deep integration into the UI, which I don't think is possible for Android extensions. So, I doubt, it will become available...

[–] stagen@feddit.dk 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] FrederikNJS@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Unfortunately apple doesn't allow any alteranative browsers on iOS... Everything that behaves as a browser must wrap Safari...

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remember when Microsoft was given an anti-trust lawsuit just for bundling IE with Windows?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ReversalHatchery 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Recently I've heard news that because of a new EU law, Apple will be required to make it possible for the users to install alternative app stores without hacks.
As I know Apple enforces the restriction you have mentioned through their app store, but shipping your browser engine is otherwise probably technically possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)

Good incentive to switch to an android device tbh!

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Please please please don't' bring MV3 to Firefox for Android, Mozilla. 🤞

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

They are, since there are definitely benefits and makes migration easier, but they are also allowing the support needed for adblockers to be just as strong as they are now. So it keeps the benefits while also keeping adblockers strong like right now.

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2021/05/27/manifest-v3-update/

The issue is that Chrome is trying to replace webRequest.BlockingResponse which is essential for content blockers, which Mozilla is pointing out and keeping supported.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Private_Plan@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

MV3 existing isn't a problem. MV2 deprecation is.

load more comments
view more: next ›