this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
392 points (100.0% liked)

RPGMemes

250 readers
1 users here now

Humor, jokes, memes about TTRPGs

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Both guards told the truth in their first lines

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not if they were both lying. Both guards are liars.

[–] Goblin_Mode@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 year ago

Which would mean guard 2 is telling the truth and not a liar

[–] SwiggitySwole@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

The way guard 2's first line is worded could be interpreted as him saying "the other (guard says) nothing but lies", meaning he's saying guard 1 is the liar which is a lie.

[–] QuinceDaPence@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sadistic DM Take - Both guards are liars and they came up with this rouse to fuck with people because they were bored.

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Necro raises first guard, compels him to kill second guard.

Necro raises second guard, has them each explore the path they blocked to check for danger

[–] neoman4426@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

On the one hand, usual formulation is you only get one question, finding out which is the liar alone is easy but useless as then you're out of questions to actually get through the gate. On the other hand, unless you get the information about the behavior of the guards from a trusted source that isn't them you have no reason to believe them, and in fact they cannot relay the setup to you accurately without giving it away if you assume they're always like that as many do.

[–] Bananablob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Guard 2 says: "The other one nothing but lies", which is assumed to be true. From the guard that lies. Was that a lie?

[–] DauntingFlamingo@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never liked this riddle. "Am I standing in front of you?" would tell you immediately

[–] Malgas 9 points 1 year ago

The object isn't to identify the liar, it's to find out which path is safe. And you only get one question.

[–] Johanno@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 year ago

Well you should assume that both guards follow the rules all time. Meaning that the initial setup of the rules cannot be trusted, because who knows if the talking Guard is lieing or not. If one does tell nothing but the truth this must be the one explaining the rules.

However if I remember correctly it was setup that one will answer the truth while the other one will deceive me. Meaning he might tell the truth if it confused me.

So no question might work.

[–] EsheLynn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

the guard: [sobbing] yes...

[–] chellewalker@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

What if... they both only tell lies? No "one of us" about it, and it would totally mess with players' heads.

Barbarian street smarts ain't by the book (or all that smart), but damn are they effective

[–] potoo22@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Everytime I see the only truth and only lier situation, I gotta repost this clip:
https://youtu.be/i99jMtnE4vw?t=03m27s

[–] Herbstzeitlose@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago