this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

1267 readers
57 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

After trying out Cosmic, Gnome,KDE Plasma, and Hyprland, I feel like plasma is the most usable for me coming from Windows. It solves the gripes I had about lack of customizability while still starting me off with a familiar homebar. I will be going back and forth with gnome for a while.

I really like gnome and the sliding desktops, and all the extensions seem to make it very customizable as well, but not directly like plasma, instead you mix and match (or make) extensions to get the look you want. (correct me if im wrong, I used it for a day)

Hyprland seems very nice for multitasking but the keyboard focus of the presets ive tried doesn't really appeal to me, I like being able to just use my mouse sometimes.

Cosmic, is definitely an alpha and im interested to see what it becomes, wont be using it now.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] funkajunk@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I started using Windows as a young lad, but when I tried using Linux I easily transitioned to KDE. Then I tried Gnome and loved it, used it for a few years before moving over to Hyprland a couple of months ago and I can confidently say that I won't be going back.

EDIT:
Forgot to mention that the main reason I love Hyprland is because of the crazy level of customization. I use it primarily on my laptop and can navigate easily with keyboard shortcuts, clicking, and even trackpad gestures.

Don't let somebody else's idea of how to use a DE limit you, just configure whatever you want!

[–] cmgvd3lw@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 week ago

Wow trackpad gestures? I'm on gnome and their gestures are really good, if hyperland's is just as good I might try it out.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kongar@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

I really like the gnome workflow plus a couple of extensions. Notably I ran across a tiling extension called “grid” that scratched my tiling window needs on my desktop, and gnome is amazing on my laptop trackpad. I zing through desktops quick! Anything it can’t do out of the box, you can find an extension for.

I like the feel of something different than windows.

[–] harsh3466@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

My preference is the opposite of yours. I just recently set up Hyprland and I love it for the focus on keyboard and the ease of customizing the keybinds.

The other thing I love is the tiling. I almost always have two windows side by side and in every other DE I've used (haven't used cosmic), I always had to faff about to get my windows half and half or into the quarters. So pair that with the keyboard focus and hyprland is the winner for me.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

plasmas had no issues going half and half or quarters, better than windows at least, but yeah my monitors are relatively small compared to what other ppl have, so i never want to divide by more than 4

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I often dont use my keyboard when casually browsing, reaching for it constantly is annoying in those cases, I'm assuming yall that use linux more are more used to the opposite and not using a graphical interface.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

KDE is the easiest for coming from Windows, you almost never never need the command line or anything "extra" to customize it (beyond what even Windows will allow).

GNOME (especially in Ubuntu) by default is more Macintosh-like which might appeal to some people, it's "simpler" but any customizations will require navigating the add-ons (and in my experience inevitably the command line too).

I think KDE is the one for most people who just want a functioning PC. GNOME could be good for the PC you might make for your parent. Bonus points for an immutable distro which are even harder to break.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trying cinnamon and it might be the superior parent rec, its basically older windows, very straightforward ui, not flashy, Gnome (at least the default i had) didn't have a start bar and required clicking the windows button to see clickable stuff that weren't icons. With extensions it can be basically windows or mac tho. (so if you directly setitup for them or guide them its more modern feeling/superior)

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Zorin is another distro that (very successfully imo) does a windows-style taskbar with GNOME and is parent friendly, though like I said before, I think today I would go with something immutable for a non-techie because they're very hard to break.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago

Universal BlueAurora KDE, or bluefin gnome are what id prob reccomend to any non gamers trying to use Linux after looking around, bazzite for gamers who dont want to tinker, cachyos for those who do. Seems like a straightforward way to get up and running, cachyos was hella easy to dualboot tho, universal blue doesnt seem to let me load a live os from my usb with a graphical installer, that was super helpful with cachy.

[–] furrowsofar 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Actually I like Cinnamom the best. For VMs without video accelertion, XFCE. For media center and my laptop I stayed with Ubuntu/Gnome.

Work flow. Any desktop will do, that is more about Apps. For me Firefox, LibreOffice esp Calc, Python, Bash, Thunderbird, ssh, Zim, Geany are what I use most.

[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

KDE has given me the desktop I need for the past few years. Hyprland isn't a desktop environment, as far as I know.

Before KDE I used Cinnamon on Linux Mint. It was functional, but after many years I wanted a change.

Use whatever suits your needs. In my experience, KDE and Cinnamon are the most complete desktop environments without having to install extensions or extra software. Both are mature, have large communities behind them, and release incremental updates frequently. Those are my criteria for a good desktop environment.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago

Trying cinnamon right now, Its definitely functional, closer to windows back when I liked it. Feels boring, but in a good for productivity way.

[–] gila@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

GNOME on my laptop, using the trackpad. Three-finger swipe up to switch tasks/search. Two-finger tap for context menus. Three-finger tap for things like opening in a new tab, or closing a tab. Simple, intuitive, efficient, comfortable.

[–] arsCynic 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Xfce for speed, consistency, and reliability. For most of my workflow I began avoiding configuring a DE as much as possible by relying on AutoKey, Input Remapper, and simple terminal commands, because I can import those to fresh installs way easier.

I moved away from Plasma due to too many small yet annoying bugs.


PS all the software I use: https://www.arscyni.cc/file/software.html

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 1 points 1 week ago

Plasma does seem to have a lot of small annoying bugs, like rnow I have to click a widget so it loads on my desktop before dragging, if I just drag plasma closes out of the editor and my screen goes black for a second.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

KDE Plasma and it's configured to have everything in the same places as Windows as much as possible. I have to use Windows for work and gaming and like it when I don't have to think much about which computer I'm using right now.

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

I love plasma. I used to be into cinnamon, but since the steamdeck, I’ve changed my preference.

Now, I have fedoranplasma spin on my thinkpad.

I really like the windows style DE.

[–] enbee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ClownsInSpace2@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I yearn for the day Debian gets proper DWL support

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Dravix@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am not using DE i am using hyprland With arch Linux btw

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 4 points 1 week ago

I keep forgetting tiling managers arent des

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Cinnamon, Feels like Gnome done right,it's stable,customizable,Mehh resource intensive. Sadly no HDR AND VRR and a bit messy underneath the hood but I can use gamescope for HDR and VRR and i kinda wish the extension ecosystem was great. My workflow idk but I rarely use gtile actions like Send to kde connect and file converting is useful.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 week ago

I use Cosmic and really like it- have used i3, Awesome and Gnome in the past for a while too, I really likes them.

The most time I spent with a set up was Awesome + rofi, which I really enjoyed. I customised literally everything and spent hours tweaking stuff.

That was super fun, but in all honesty my workflow is more or less:

  1. Open up a terminal (alacritty, tmux + fish shell + helix editor)
  2. Open up a browser (Firefox, have played with others but there's always some quirk where I give up)
  3. That's it.

Honestly, all the tweaking is fun for me, but with my workflow I have like 0 requirements for anything fancy. Daily driving cosmic is going nicely for now, and seems to mostly get out of my way.

[–] buwho@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 week ago

ive used many de's and wm's over the last 15+ years and ended using gnome the most. most familiar with it now so, its fine for me.

[–] wesker@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I use emptty and herbsluft.

[–] despaircode@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Not often I meet another herbsluft user in the wild! waves

[–] commander@lemmings.world 3 points 1 week ago

KDE.

Mostly like Windows 7, but I recently moved the dock to the top.

[–] Hellstormy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

I just recently switched to using the COSMIC alpha, coming from KDE on my personal laptop and from GNOME on my work laptop. I absolutely love it. It's very stable and polished for still being in alpha.

I really like its tiling and workspaces. The navigation just feels very natural to me. I am a very big fan of keyboard only navigation.

Since both of my laptops have hybrid graphics, I am also a fan of COSMIC's approach to hybrid graphics, that it generally let's you quite easily specify if you want to run an app on dGPU or iGPU.

And last of all it just looks gorgeous.

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I went cold turkey to gnome and I use KDE on my laptop. Both configured to use super + type in what I want to open. I quit windows since I got used to it and they stopped providing it. I like both but gnome is way more finished while kde feels a bit janky at times. I really love the customization ability of KDE and I find once I messed up and had to reinstall once, I got over my urges to needlessly rice. I don't know if it is distro specific but I am pretty upset fedora gnome does not have create new file under right click but you have to use terminal (goes completely against gnome philosophy) or to go edit hidden folders and use terminal to create a template (goes very against gnome philosophy).

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah I dont think hyprland will become a mainstay for me, but I will be copying that super plus shortcut way of working over to the other DEs, im just not productive 24/7 (nor do I want to be) so fully commiting to a tiling manager doesnt make sense

[–] endeavor@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

Id like to see what all the buzz about hyperland is one day. When it's not buggy and comes with a distro.

[–] major_jellyfish@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Tried i3 a few years back. Never went back. Fucking love it. Would like to ditch X for Wayland soon though. Need to move to Sway but a bunch of scripts depend on X.. Probably wouldn't be too much of a nightmare to transition, but for some reason I've been putting it off for years.

[–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

After a lot of jumping around I settled for Plasma, with just the default dark theme plus a few minor tweaks and that's it. It's super easy to use and it runs pretty smoothly now unlike 5+ years ago. I was into the whole tiling wm rabbithole for a while but got bored of it and I mostly just want everything fullscreen so I wasn't even making use of the tiling.

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 2 points 1 week ago

I have been liking river lately after switching to it from hyprland. River is much more similar to my previous one which was xmonad.

[–] questionAsker@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

XFCE and well, straightforward usage without endless tweaking and customization. On the other side, I recently(~2 years:)) felt in love with tiling window manager BSPWM and keyboard-driven usage.

[–] thedaemon@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago

CWM, calm window manager. It's based off Plan 9's Rio and made for OpenBSD, there is a Linux port. I also admit I use KDE sometimes.

[–] Frederic 2 points 1 week ago

old school here, started with X Terminal and motif (mwm) and played with twm of fvwm last century. I have always like Xfwm/Xfce because it is simple and it works. I have the start menu/quick launches, the button bar where windows appears, and the icon area, a little bit like windows 95. No icons on my desktop.

[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago

KDE and I keep it mostly stock. I usually get a compact desktop pager widget and add a kwin plugin to dynamically add/remove virtual desktops.

[–] hossein@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 week ago
[–] eugenia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like Cinnamon, stacked on the right (vertical bar) with the third party cinnamenu start menu. Simple, and it works.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 1 points 1 week ago

I keep hearing good things, ill try it out, when I first looked it up it didnt seem as customizable based off screenshots but im seeing posts about how its more customizable than gnome

[–] kittenroar 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Lxqt, with pcmanfm's desktop ability turned off. I use the terminal for my file management anyway

I usually have several terminal tabs and web browser tabs open plus a tmux session. Neovim for coding and writing, feh and mpv for viewing media, mpd, supysonic, and minidlna for streaming and playing music.

[–] Dungrad@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

Krunner on Meta And a lot of alt + tab

That's pretty much it 😅

[–] drwho 1 points 1 week ago

I use Mate on my laptop; before that I used Cinnamon.

To be honest, DEs are basically terminal window managers for me. If I didn't need a graphical web browser for everything I do (because that's basically what software is these days - shit you log into from a web browser) I'd probably be using GNU Screen or possibly Twin to manage multiple shells instead.

If the drag-and-drop functionality of modern DEs wasn't so helpful I'd probably still be using twm because I like stuff that does what I need, and otherwise stays out of my way.

load more comments
view more: next ›