this post was submitted on 12 Sep 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

Game Development

61 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to the game development community! This is a place to talk about and post anything related to the field of game development.

Community Wiki

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Charzard4261@programming.dev 61 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I get that they wanted in on the Pokémon Go and Genshin Impact money printers, but anyone could have seen how much damage to their reputation it was going to cause.

Too little too late. Personally I've moved to Godot and am loving it. Have I mentioned that they have stellar documentation yet?

[–] GammaGames 27 points 2 weeks ago

AND that the documentation is built in to the engine, only a 60mb download!

[–] jlow 5 points 2 weeks ago

Along with Krita's one of the best docs I know, it's so good!

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 56 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Damage done. It became a great example of why it isn't a good idea to rely on an engine operated by a corporate entity, since there's always a chance your product will be directly affected by some external executive's random choice.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 9 points 2 weeks ago

I got personally screwed by this when I sunk the cash into Substance Painter / Designer, and then they "joined the Adobe family."

At this point any software in my pipeline that's not FOSS would be considered a point of vulnerability.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 43 points 2 weeks ago

D'awww, did someone's little cash grab not work out?

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Great, but why were no one but the bean-counters consulted when coming out with the blatant money-stealing scheme in the first place?

You have a lot of trust to build back because Godot has come a decently long way.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 3 points 2 weeks ago

But some won't consider it. I was 2 months into a project and abandoned it. I'm now knee deep into another project in Unreal. If this doesn't go well, it'll be Godot, or Bevy or Armory. Unity is dead to me. It's still the same company run by the same board and I do not trust them.

[–] Kissaki@programming.dev 19 points 2 weeks ago

we’ve made the decision to cancel the Runtime Fee for our games customers, effective immediately. Non-gaming Industry customers are not impacted by this modification.

Unity Personal: […] Unity Personal will remain free, and we’ll be doubling the current revenue and funding ceiling from $100,000 to $200,000 USD. […] The Made with Unity splash screen will become optional for Unity Personal games made with Unity 6 when it launches later this year.

at its heart, it must be a partnership built on trust

well… as much trust as you can get back after such activities.

[–] popcar2@programming.dev 19 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I remember so much pessimism last year that people's complaints will change nothing and that almost every Unity dev is too deep and won't be able to switch engines.

Well, guess what, so many people did switch and Unity did feel the hurt. The community really did take action.

Everyone's going to (rightfully) dunk on Unity but I think this is a great move and it's nice that the engine isn't going away. Competition is always good, and I'm happy for the devs that did stick with the engine. Lots of studios celebrating on social media with a sigh of relief. I still think Godot is going to eat Unity's lunch the next few years so they better step it up.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Did they though? I haven't heard of a single big name studio switching to an opensource game engine.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] b_van_b@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago

I only know about the developers of Slay the Spire switching to Godot. Not the biggest name, but still well-known.

https://www.pcgamer.com/games/card-games/slay-the-spire-2-ditched-unity-for-open-source-engine-godot-after-2-years-of-development/

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemm.ee 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Most don't switch as they have in house skills that would cost to retrain. The real kicker is the big studios of the future that started their projects on Godot. Those Godot games that succeed (like Cassette Beasts or Brotato) may fund the big studios of the future, and you know their leads will be Godot specialists looking for Godot devs.

Other big studios may trial Godot, but when the seed is planted, the trees take 2 to 5 years to mature.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

I can only hope the ecosystem will very different in 5 years.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] sukhmel@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago

Big names probably plan ahead and may have switched the projects that were not too deep into development or haven't started yet. But it's likely something to not be loudly announced

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I tough they canceled it in the weeks after the outrage

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 26 points 2 weeks ago

I think they only cancelled the "this applies retroactively to previous versions" bit. They removed some of the egregious parts of the runtime free, but otherwise kept it.

[–] Tramort@programming.dev 12 points 2 weeks ago

Related - A Unity programmers take on Godot:

https://lemmy.ml/post/20205357

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 8 points 2 weeks ago
[–] GammaGames 7 points 2 weeks ago

Someone else saw the ldtk jam chart, huh?