this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
540 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

113 readers
6 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

For the curious, this is factual, not just true. Source: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/homeless-man-vs-corporate-thief/

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 39 points 8 months ago

"It's a big club, and you ain’t in it." - George Carlin

[–] kersplomp@programming.dev 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Snopes: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/homeless-man-vs-corporate-thief/

It's true, but note that Allan received a reduced sentence for testifying against the actual mastermind of the fraud, who got 30 years.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Twice as long as the homeless man, yes.

The difference in dollars and impact though, and considering who turned themselves in... It's still an egregious sentence for $100.

[–] bluewing@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

It wasn't the amount - It was the "who" that the homeless person robbed. He didn't steal from a local liquor store or 7/11. He robbed from a bank. And bank robbery, since the time there have been banks to rob from, has always carried certain heavy punishments. And the punishments are well known to even a homeless person. And very often the judge gets no choice or leeway in the sentencing.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 8 months ago

And TB&W also stole from banks through fraud.

The judge isn't the issue being called out, the laws and associated punishments are.

So.. yes. And my point stands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] oo1@lemmings.world 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

you can't easily or directly compare the monetary value of violent vs non-violent crime. Robbery is not about the money from a severity perspective. Any robbery will be much more heavily punished than a theft of the same monetary value due to the violence or threat of violence agaist the person or people.

If you stick a gun in someones face and ask them for one cent, you still should be going to jail for a decent amount of time - way more than shoplifting a 500 dollar tv.

15 years does seem a lot though, you might have expected them to at least wave the weapon around, or put it direct to someones head, or put a knife to the throat - that doesn't seem to be the case here. but if it were less than 5 , I'd think they'd got off lightly for robbery.

The homeless guy should have shoplifted food from grocery store - not gone and threatened someones life.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

That's certainly quite the interpretation of what happened when Roy Brown went into the bank, said "this is a stickup" with no weapon, was handed three stacks of bills, took a single $100 bill, handed the rest back and said "Sorry, I'm homeless".

In other words, not remotely what you described.

Goodbye.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

“Let’s see Paul Allen’s sentence.”

[–] jayk@lemmy.ca 9 points 8 months ago

his subtle off-white colouring got him a lighter sentence

[–] kindenough@kbin.earth 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It is whom your stealing from. Madoff for instance robbed the wrong people, should've robbed proletarians.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Homeless guy shoulda stolen $3b instead of just $100 🤷🏻‍♂️

[–] twinnie@feddit.uk 10 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Tbf, sounds kinda like the homeless man wanted to get caught, maybe for the free rent.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 13 points 8 months ago

You are showing your innocence.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Right. Even if we assume that's the case it only explains one guy getting a harsh sentence. It doesn't explain the guy with a way harsher crime not getting a harsh sentence.

Think of it this way. If the other guy had robbed the bank empty, just for the sake of the argument he stole 3 billion, and he didn't turn himself out do you think he should've gotten 40 months?

[–] LordPassionFruit@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

The first time I saw this picture, I was in middle school. It may well have been my first introduction to politics and started me down the path of leftism in general. Over a decade later and nothing's changed.

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

End Stage Capitalism: "Laws for thee (the poor), not for me (the wealthy)."

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

That's regular Capitalism, end-stage is when Capitalism reaches out internationally to dominate less developed countries with predatory loans (like from the IMF) and exporting Capital to produce goods for far lower wages than you would domestically.

[–] Axolotling 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Are you trying to imply that the US doesn't already do this? They've overthrown democratically elected governments all over the latin americas (and other places, like hawaii) and imposed more fascist ones for access to their raw materials. Sure it's not exactly using loans to do that, but the real end-game is fascism anyways once markets are fully saturated and there are no more ways to generate capital.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

Are you trying to imply that the US doesn't already do this?

No, the exact opposite. We are at End-Stage Capitalism, there's not much left for it to go.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago

Let's see him get a reservation at the Dorsia now, the stupid fucking bastard.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 2 points 8 months ago

Lore accurate Paul Allen

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

While a 15 year sentence is definitely too high, it's important to acknowledge that there is a difference between a bank robbery and fraud.

[–] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, the difference is one's an honest, victimless crime.

[–] 737@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Neither of the crimes is honest nor victimless.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

homeless man

He honestly needed money

banks make their money by preying on the poor, and are insured against theft

Victimless

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I think the issue with the homeless guys it was possible armed robbery and he probably had priors, so its not an insanely long sentence for what he did.

[–] sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Someone posted the snopes. It calls into question a bunch of assumptions you're making.

[–] CableMonster@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Calling things into question doesnt mean much. Stories like these 99% of the time are misleading.