this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
139 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37625 readers
63 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MagicShel@programming.dev 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The thing is RH shouldn't even claim ownership of RHEL. Their business is support. The more RHEL that's out there, the more someone is likely to pay for a support incident.

The moment they started thinking they own a particular Linux package, even one they assembled, they became evil.

In fairness, IBM has been evil since long before they thought they owned RHEL.

[–] sanzky 1 points 1 year ago

part of the problem is that RHEL is so damn solid that most companies can use it without any support. that is why centOS was so popular