Politics

10175 readers

8 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

Socialism

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

"You’re a Charlatan”: Pro-Trump MAGA Clerk Is Going to Prison for Tampering with Voting Machines in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election (newrepublic.com)

submitted 1 month ago by tardigrada to c/politics

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Archived version

Former Mesa County Clerk Tina Peters was sentenced to nine years for allowing a man to use a security card to access her county’s election system, and deceiving investigators about who the person was. He was later determined to be working with MAGA gadfly and pillow magnate Mike Lindell, a prominent election denialist and supporter of Donald Trump.

"I am convinced you would do it all over again if you could. You’re as defiant as any defendant this court has ever seen,” District Judge Matthew Barrett told Peters in announcing the sentence. “You are no hero. You abused your position and you’re a charlatan.”

Barrett said that Peters, a Republican, didn’t take her job seriously, espousing claims about rigged voting machines even after they were disproven. During the trial, prosecutors said that Peters was seeking attention after associating with election denialists, and Peters remained unrepentant about her crimes.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FlashMobOfOne 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not the argument they're making when they crow about voter fraud.

They're pretending that wide-spread (the key word) voter fraud is existent and normalized, where in fact, it's rare and doesn't have the potential to impact elections in any significant way.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

It's the "P" in "GOP":

Gaslighting
Obstructionism
Projection