Gaming

30555 readers

37 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Bethesda responding to negative Starfield reviews on Steam (www.eurogamer.net)

submitted 11 months ago by Hdcase to c/gaming

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Thalestr 61 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (7 children)

The title made me think they were responding to users that needed customer support, but no. This:

Meanwhile, when another user lamented the amount of loading screens, the support team replied imploring the reviewer to "consider the amount of data for the expansive gameplay that is procedurally generated to load flawlessly in under three seconds".

is just pathetic. This is nothing more than low-effort damage control. Which, funnily enough, is rather fitting for Starfield in general. It's not a terrible game but it absolutely fell flat on its face on its biggest selling points. Procedural exploration will always have drawbacks but No Man's Sky absolutely smashes Starfield in this department and it came out nearly 8 years ago and made by a team a fraction of the size. And I don't expect Bethesda to put in the same effort as Hello did and make Starfield live up to its promises

[–] SenorBolsa 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I got my monies worth out of it, but yeah, it's missing the mark compared to their previous games.

load more comments (6 replies)