The first country to kill off LLMs with draconian interpretations of copyright law will simply be handing the industry to other countries on a golden platter. For this reason, I don't see the U.S. ruling in any sort of way that would damage the AI industry too much. There is simply too much money involved.
Ah yes, Sayuri.
Does that not hurt? Vaseline seems like it would be way too gummy and thick?
Who do they think their audience is? Is this the result of their attempts to gain viewers in the American South?
The enshittification brought to you by IBM.
Femboy programmer socks
Emulating Gamecube games is pretty low-spec if you compile the shaders beforehand. Battery life nets 2-3 hours on flights for me (Steam Deck). I have nearly 2000 hours of Animal Crossing GC combined, pls don't judge me 😅.
We don't have full-featured native clients quite yet, but I like the rapid pace we are advancing.
I think the common theme of flesh-eating is what is the problem. Do I agree with it? Not really. It's obvious satire and commentary. You are welcome to post on https://kbin.social/m/schizophrenicpissdawn as the barely unhinged is the kind of content we enjoy both on the subreddit and here.
Given how much he has already lied I don't believe him one bit. Taking an adversarial approach against your own community should tell them everything they need to know about how things will progress from here.
It’s certainly an odd metric but it is a true one. Sex sells I guess.
Given how we train models (content and math), AIs is not practical to ban/legislate away. While the public applications of AI are for content generation and NLP, as @Rinox alluded to, the military applications are where we are going to see the most focus from the government. As an example, the Lantirn targeting pod uses SVMs to profile aircraft from afar, and it took enormous engineering to get it accurate. Comparable object detection functionality can be obtained with NNs and off-the-shelf GPUs. Countries like China already have "differing philosophies" when it comes to intellectual property rights, so we can remove the largest manufacturing market from the potential list of those who would blanket ban AI. Ditto on any possibility of their military forgoing AI either.
The real problem here is copyright law, which has extended protections far and above the length of time that is reasonable. Had we terms of say 35 years, we could simply train on older material.