Of course I assume the scientist contacted the lawyers who know the copyright laws better than me, but shouldn't this be under fair use as providing commentary? It's not like it's just an album of emojis, it's a book that describes them in great detail, which is transformative.
What's the second one? Bible/religion?
Reads in Gianni's voice
kid named reading the tweet yourself instead of reading a re-telling of a tweet:
I often look up the tweets/original news stories just because media often twists the context or grasps at straws to make for a flashier headline.
mate what happened with those ls
No, that will happen whenever you pull in the changes from them. You basically do a merge of their branch into your branch, which is really similar to making a PR to them (in the former case you integrate their changes into your repo, in the latter it's vice versa). In both cases Git will observe two conflicting sets of changes (one branch modified what another branch removed)
If the themes change in the upstream, I think you'll still end up with "both modified" type conflict, "modified by them and deleted by us".
How is that not the Onion
Goes hard
What even is this device? Is the purpose to always be able to say "oh shit, my friend is calling" to get away from a conversation?
Why can't I see some of the images in the posts?
How dare you suggest I read the article and not just comment on the post title!
Jokes aside, that's the worst part of the legal system. What good are the laws, if you need to be wealthy to take up the fight to get them enforced?