Danke, ich hasse solche ""Artikel""
mineapple
Absolutely not. Came not even close to 16GB usage (yet) But I thought that it would be nice to have, and that the prices wouldn't go lower anytime soon, so I thought I might as well take the 32Gigs
poor elephant 🥺
Point out where I spoke for all women?
About there:
the fact that women find being attracted to imaginary women a pretty big turn off.
I dont feel threatened at all. Im just saying its dumb to speak in behalf of all women when it is just your opinion. And your double standards are also interesting. When you tell the world, what you consider a turn off but can't handle it for me to say the same.
Essentially it is exactly the proof against what you were saying: Even though I might find people sexually attractive from a visual impression, overall attraction to a person is way more nuanced.
I have a last question for you: Do you also have the same disgust towards people who would say that the girl with a pearl earring, or any other painted or drawn person is attractive?
And this human being here is the prophet of all female human beings and can speak in behalf of all of them. I myself find it a big turn off for a person to be so insecure about what defines them as attractive, besides their visual appearance.
The same word could also be used to evaluate if you should kill an insect, so what's the point? It is a short form for: "Do you find given appearance sexually attractive, or not?" That term would be a bit long for a button, wouldn't it?
So you're saying men aren't allowed to find women attractive that are objectively more attractive then them?
Vor the site you have visited and has some hidden SEO spam related to its topic.
Was ist hier der Kontext?
Ehrenréne
We had a TV report about a photographer who actually transfered big files with via horse because the transfer over the internet was slower than a calm ride. (Germany - 2021) link for Germans