PapaStevesy

joined 1 year ago
[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 13 points 3 months ago

Same exact thing as "How can mirrors be real if our eyes aren't real?"

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 6 points 3 months ago

Yeah, it's corporate astrology

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

"Small" is extremely relative, I'd say centimeters are small too.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago

Nice, I can update my résumé!

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 3 points 4 months ago

Stone isn't a measurement in America, it's inorganic material. The next-heighest commonly known weight is a ton, or 2000 lbs. Not very helpful.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

No, we give our weight in pounds instead of ounces because weight is one of those things that doesn't really need to be exact and will change by a couple dozen ounces or so based on the time of day and what you've eaten.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I see a mistake...

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Greenlits?! Lol, where have the editors gone

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A threat's a threat, I doubt snakes are aware of the fact that they even have venom, much less that it only works on certain living biological entities. But I'm no Snake Scientist, so I could obviously be totally wrong.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

Exactly, it doesn't belong to the offspring, that's why I said it is a proto-chicken's egg. It belongs to the ones that made it and raised it. But we know the contents because it's a preset hypothetical in which the egg hatches and it has a chicken in it. So it's a chicken egg that belongs to proto-chickens.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I just don't get why you're so hung up on the potentiality of an unhatched egg when that has nothing to do with the scenario. The egg in the scenario hatches and it has a chicken in it. That's the whole point of the scenario.

[–] PapaStevesy@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, we were necessarily ignoring the obvious evolutionary issues inherent in the chicken-and-egg scenario, since it very clearly was not one egg-laying instance that created a new species. I know I made reference to as much somewhere in the thread, it seemed like a waste of time to restate it every comment. I'm fairly certain we were on the same page about that. Cool wall though!

view more: next ›