A community for Buddhists and those interested in discussing Buddhism
Personally I don't follow one tradition. I have my own flavor, including stuff from outside of buddhism. I don't really put much importance on tradition, it's just whatever I feel.
The closest thing to being apart of a tradition i have is that I'm a certified reiki healer, and I sort of have my own flavor of that as well, plus it's not really buddhism per se.
I haven't switched traditions exactly, but something like it. I started out Theravada in my studies and understanding. I went to several 10 day retreats under Theravada teachers. Eventually I came into contact with some Chan and Zen practitioners, and learned some of their philosophy. I took the Bodhisattva vows and am firmly in that camp now. Now, as to your question about why to make a change?
The Chan group that I buddied up with put us through a program of academic training during which I studied the Lotus Sutra. Initially I thought the Lotus Sutra was nonsense. Why in the world would the Buddha deceive us for "skillful means?"
I'm still not sure I believe in the Lotus Sutra, but I don't think it matters. The Buddha teaches therein that the true path becomes clear when we gain enough wisdom, so to speak. Specifically, he said that all his teachings so far were just in preparation for the true path of the Bodhisattva. It's controversial to say that arhats are not done with their spiritual development, but considering the Buddha claims in the Lotus Sutra that becoming an arhat was just preparation for the Bodhisattva path...that means they are actually the same training. So whether Bodhisattva or not, the training and practice can be the same. If I become an arhat and see different, so be it.
Some people balk at the idea of a Bodhisattva making a vow to come back eternally, but that's not actually a vow that I took. Vowing to liberate all beings doesn't mean staying here forever. I have vowed to become a Buddha. As daunting as it is to come back for several mahakappas, that's ok, it's still a finite time period to achieve the greatest relief of suffering.
Thank you for sharing your history and perspectives, I found them both very informative and intriguing. If you're interested in fielding questions, I have a few:
What was your perception of Mahayana before changing traditions and how has it changed?
I may be wrong, but I thought that the Lotus Sutra was central to the Mahayana tradition and by extension Chan. Has your reservations about the Sutra posed any challenges for you (internally or external) as you've embraced Chan?
What do you think Chan offered you that you weren't getting from the Theravada tradition.
Thank you for your time.