this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
10 points (100.0% liked)

Movies and TV Shows

32 readers
10 users here now

A community for entertainment industry news and general discussion about movies and TV shows.

Rules:

  1. Be civil.
  2. Please do not link to pirated content.
  3. No spoilers in the title of submissions. And please use spoiler MarkDown in the body of discussions. This is a courtesy to other users.
  4. Comments solely criticizing headlines and/or journalism will be removed for being off-topic.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Djinn@lemm.ee
10
What are some neat ways shows and movies have dealt with "Why didn't they use the Eagles to get to Mount Doom?"-style questions? (leminal.space)
submitted 1 month ago by CorrodedCranium@leminal.space to c/moviesandtv@lemm.ee
1 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I am mostly referring to show or movie creators answering questions in ways that might effect the lore. They don't have to be plot holes, super significant, or still held to be canon.

For example maybe it was a small detail they elaborated on or they answered a long running question.

I was originally going to give the example of why characters in Star Wars don't toggle their light sabers on and off during combat but it seems like the explanation I was more of a fan theory from what I can tell.

The question can also apply to video games if you have an answer with one of them.

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ptz@dubvee.org 4 points 1 month ago

In Star Trek, there's always some kind of dampening field, prior battle damage, or other hand wave to explain away why they can't just use the transporter to get the characters out of danger. The lore is affected by the ever-increasing list of phenomena future episodes/series have to contend with when writing around the transporter.