Unfortunately it’s not easy to recycle back into a form that can be used to make new concrete structures
Wait what? I am pretty sure I’ve seen videos explaining that concrete is the most recycled substance in the world …
this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
16 points (100.0% liked)
Environment
3923 readers
4 users here now
Environmental and ecological discussion, particularly of things like weather and other natural phenomena (especially if they're not breaking news).
See also our Nature and Gardening community for discussion centered around things like hiking, animals in their natural habitat, and gardening (urban or rural).
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Depends on your definition of "recycled" (spoiler: you've been lied to).
Concrete = cement + sand + aggregate (rubble) + water
- Cement: requires a lot of energy to product
- Sand: riverbed sand, no desert sand
- Aggregate: some crushed rock-like stuff (of varying sizes)
"Recycling" concrete, is done by crushing it and using as either road filler, or aggregate for new concrete with worse properties than the original. It doesn't turn concrete back into "cement + sand + aggregate".
For an example, check this funny definition of "recycling" (*with just some waste) from Sika:
https://www.sika.com/en/knowledge-hub/can-concrete-be-recycled.html
“Recycling” concrete, is done by crushing it and using as either road filler, or aggregate for new concrete with worse properties than the original. It doesn’t turn concrete back into “cement + sand + aggregate”.
I mean... That's recycling. You literally just said "you've been lied to" and then immediately followed it up with an explanation of how it's recycled. And then you literally linked an article that explains that concrete is recycled...
However, within a recycling economy, old concrete may be recycled and reused within new concrete production. This is already being done in the concrete industry. Ultimately, we strive for a circular economy, where there is no waste at all in the concrete production and recycling process.
If you think "recycling" a thing means throwing part of it away, then adding some fundamental non-renewable component in order to make the same thing again, or that "recycling" is not the same as "circular production"... maybe you've not only been lied to, but also brainwashed?
Also, yeah that's literally how recycling works.. do you think they recycle the labels on glass bottles? no they burn them off to get the glass. Then they make a new bottle, then they put new labels on it. literally doing exactly what you're saying "isn't recycling".
Still, that's not at all what happens when recycling concrete.
Did you read what you just wrote? If they don't recycle the labels, then... yeah, that's not recycling.
Cherry-picking which part gets recycled and which not, then calling it all "recycling", is where the brainwashing comes into play.
You may notice that in action on the web I linked, where they call "Recycling" whatever they want, but come up with a different name of "Circular economy" for... let's see, "re-cycling"... where does that word come from, again?
With concrete it's even more egregious.
That's literally not what's happening. Did you even read the article you posted? Or did you just google, find something that you thought supported your position, then cherry picked that bit out not realizing that the entire article completely disagrees with you?