this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
169 points (100.0% liked)

Programmer Humor

421 readers
18 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

"Old". This was after I started reading it.

At the same time, it's about 1200 strips before the latest, which is like 7 years ago? But still not even halfway back, not quite.

Man, he's been around since forever.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

Yeah same, I've been reading them all again and I didn't check when it was originally posted but it seemed far enough from today to count as old!

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Why did you have to say that?! RIP Robin Williams :(

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

goddamn it, it's been this long? rip.

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah man, loads of good people died in 2016, it was a whole thing.

[–] insomniac_lemon@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

I am not a programmer, but on 2 occasions I was able to improperly fix (1 argument in 1 line stuff) very small bugs without really understanding how. I've also made a number converter (dec-bin-hex) at least twice. I know those aren't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice twice.

I'd say there's an issue here with language design having major tradeoffs, but maybe it's just a paradox*? Though I have found a language I like (even though I'm not learning it because other issues), so I know it's not impossible at least.

*= Like the people who could make something with less tradeoffs don't have the need/desire to do that, they just use the existing stuff. Though that is much more fitting for visual programming.

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

it's weird that it happened twice

Everyone who dabbles in programming eventually learns :q. Not everyone learns :wq.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 4 points 8 months ago

I learned :q! first!

[–] Luvon 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago (2 children)
[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Wtf is this bullshit. When tf did vim start allowing you to do the same thing in more than one way

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

hmm, when was vim invented?...

[–] jeremyparker@programming.dev 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Vim wasn't invented, it spawned fully written and tested at the moment creation came into existence

That's why vi is already installed on every Linux system

[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 1 points 8 months ago

of course!

no but i bet configurability was an early fearure

[–] Luvon 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Oh I don’t know that one, what’s it do?

[–] Undearius@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 months ago

Same as :wq and :x

Saves and quits.

[–] GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml 5 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Why linking to a page that contains an image instead of posting the image with the source?

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 48 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

Linking an xkcd image directly would strip out the hover text, which is part of the comic.

P.S.
You're one of today's lucky 10,000.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 6 points 8 months ago (2 children)

How do you get the hover text on mobile?

[–] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Some browsers show it when you long press the image. For the others, you can edit the URL to m.xkcd.com

[–] Zoop 7 points 8 months ago

Here's the hover text for this one:

Learning arcane bullshit from the 80s can break your computer, but if you're willing to wade through arcane bullshit from programmers in the 90s and 2000s, you can break everyone else's computers, too.

[–] toototabon@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

is this common for xkcd? because then I've been missing a whole layer of all the comics I've stumbled upon.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 10 points 8 months ago

Oh boy, every xkcd (maybe except the first hundred?) has alt-text, time for you to read them all again!

[–] Celestus@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

Linking to the page is the best way to share an xkcd

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

My lemmy client shows the full image anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Discover5164@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)
[–] smeg@feddit.uk 2 points 8 months ago

Summit, it's pretty good