this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2024
375 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

1357 readers
35 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I love purple but I would hate this kitchen.

My living room walls are purple but less intense than this and offset with blues and off-white. You have to be careful with purple. It gets overwhelming quick.

lol what a waste of money.

[–] denast@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago

Honestly if the color would be less vibrant and more washed out, it'd look great. I love to the floor has purple accents as well that match the furniture

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 11 points 9 months ago

I like it tho. Purple is a rare color.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Lol I could probably get that kitchen for like $8000. Who the fuck did they hire?

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 19 points 9 months ago

A clowntractor

[–] AnAngryAlpaca@feddit.de 2 points 9 months ago

Well clearly someone who is colorblind...

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 2 points 9 months ago

Maybe $15k dollarydoos?

[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

It was the highlight of the flip. Just not for the reasons you thought.

[–] reddthat_209@reddthat.com 7 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 7 points 9 months ago
[–] zurohki@aussie.zone 6 points 9 months ago

Plot twist: the dude is colourblind and thinks that's brown.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not sure about others but I like this color scheme

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 months ago

The colour scheme is ok and is even used a lot by brands, but it doesn't work at all for this kitchen. I can't believe the kitchen company even agreed to it. As in, I would imagine they'd warn them it's gonna be f*ing ugly and only go through with it when they insist.

[–] WaylandHater26@lemmy.zip 6 points 9 months ago

The house from the cat in the hat movie

Mojo Dojo Casa House.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago
[–] frightful_hobgoblin@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I wish I could do original things with my gaff but you gotta be conservative because housing is a commodity.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you're gonna go for the unusual, you have to fully commit to it. Don't stop halfway, because it's gonna be cringe. But if you go all the way, they will call it art, and they'll pay you multiple times over what you paid for it.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

With art, there is an inverse relationship between the number of people who will buy it and how much they'll pay for it. Art everyone wants is cheap, niche art is expensive.

If you go full send, you can charge more if the stars align and you can find a buyer.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, to bring it back to the OP, the problem here is they clearly didn't go full send. It's definitely tacky, but not tacky enough. How about some gold fixtures and doorknobs? What's up with that hideous tiling behind the stove? Why is there a regular old ceiling light and not a friggin' Svarovski chandelier? Spend another 15 grand on those and you might find someone who's willing (and high enough) to pay you 20% over ask.

It's gonna be drug money, but they'll pay.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What I'm saying is that it's a tradeoff. The fuller the send, the harder it is to find a buyer, but the more they'll pay.

Conversely, the emptier(???) the send, the more buyers will be interested, but the less you can charge.

I think going tackier would let them charge more if they found a buyer, but it would make it even less likely to find a buyer. This is already a full enough send the they're struggling to find anyone interested, send it any harder and there would be no chance.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes, but that sorta implies that it's a linear relationship, which it likely isn't.

I'm thinking it's probably more like the uncanny valley, with a trough in the middle where your send is neither full enough nor standard enough to find ANY buyers at all. Then again, there were quite a few commenters here who said they love it so perhaps I'm wrong about that.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

We're both just speculating here. I'd be interested if anyone has done any studies on this, I doubt it. Not really something useful for society.

I was basing my speculation off of the very little I've learned about the sale of art (paintings, etc) where art with a broad appeal doesn't go for much, but niche art will sell for much more if you can find a buyer. But I'm sure there are depths to that of which I'm completely unaware, and I'm sure it can't just be applied to home renos just like that. I just get a gut feeling that there are some parallels.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Well, yes. The Wikipedia article I linked does indeed say that this is a hypothesis, which means it hasn't been conclusively proven yet. But it does also list a number of reasons that lead to this hypothesis being proposed, and there's a long-ish paragraph on the research that has been done on it. But yes, as long as it's a hypothesis, it's still in the realm of speculation.

It seems however that your experience does somewhat back that up, judging by the "if you can find a buyer". Basically, what I'm saying is, that if depends on or determines whether an artwork falls into the uncanny valley. If you can find one, it was on the other side of it. If you can't, then it was in it.

Basically, picture the graph from that article, but instead of "human likeness", we label the x-axis "artistic appeal", and the y-axis "amount sold for". Get rid of the dotted line, and on the solid line we replace "stuffed animal" with "broad appeal" and "corpse" with "niche appeal that doesn't sell", and the far end of it we label "niche appeal that DOES sell" and place it much higher up, to where "healthy person" is. Hope that makes sense.

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty familiar with the uncanny valley, and I don't really think it applies to kitchens beyond as a metaphor. But then again, you could say the same about my relating it to the fine art market (and I cannot stress enough how little my expertise is in this regard lol).

Nothing with people IRL is ever a linear relationship so I imagine the truth is somewhere in-between lol

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 2 points 9 months ago

Like I said, it was just a speculation I had, because for me, this kitchen definitely falls into uncanny valley territory. A little more ooomph and it might have paid off, or a little less and it might have sold reasonably. But again, there were many commenters here who actually said they DID love it, so perhaps I'm wrong. But that's assuming they actually have enough money to actually buy it, which at least some of them admitted they don't.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 4 points 9 months ago

I initially saw this post while wearing blue blocking glasses and it looked completely normal

As a survival strategy I therefore propose

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 months ago

It's hideous.

My SO would love it.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] Che_Donkey@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

Like Thanos and Grimmace had a three way with Barney

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

There's no such thing as bad or good taste, when it's limited to one's choices.

When you are calling your own taste good, or some other person's taste good just because, and make it something social - that'll always be bad taste.

Yeah, and market doesn't have anything to do with taste.

About the photo - if not for that horrible floor, I'd like it. Should have made it solid dark gray.

EDIT: LOL, I see a few people strongly disagree with the fact that it's really bad taste to pretend that taste is not subjective.

That's actually the only thing determining "bad" and "good" taste - when the thing's appearance clearly shows that the author thought their taste is "good" by association alone, like Disney Star Wars or maybe by imitating a style which is "good".

There are, of course, things like laws of composition and colors chosen etc, but these are still not objective and differ for various kinds of art.

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 3 points 9 months ago

I honestly like it

[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 months ago

Cool AF for a place to visit.

Would not want to live there permanently. Is OP a wizard or something? Lol

[–] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

im sure this is fake but, would

[–] Psiczar@aussie.zone 2 points 9 months ago

Someone call 911, Grimace has been murdered!

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

POV: you're on your kitchen while your husband keep looking at his rocks.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 9 months ago
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 9 months ago

If I were rich, yeah I'd want purple on this level

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Honestly, the interior decor of a house probably seldom matters.

It always depends on geography.

If you have a outrageously painted kitchen inside a house in a prime area, no one is going to care about the colors of the cupboards.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 3 points 9 months ago

Well, if you have a house to sell in a prime area, there's no need to put in an outrageous kitchen like that in order to attract buyers. The only reason you'd need to do that is if your house ISN'T.

[–] hefty4871@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 months ago

Send the listing to Marie Schrader.