this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
58 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

64 readers
27 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Calls for special deal to be struck for NT, which has biggest funding gap between public and private schools

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I am ok with the government giving money to private schools. I personally never went to one, and my kids don't either.

But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding. Some parents are rich enough to contribute more above that, but they still entitled to the same government funding that every other kid gets.

You can't on one hand say 'tax the rich', then a minute later deny them services. That would be unfair.

[–] abhibeckert 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But every kid is entitled to $x per year funding

According to the ABC, independent private schools average $10k per year per student and public schools $14k per year.

AFAIK The exact amount a private school gets depends on how affluent the families are estimated to be (estimated by the government - not the school).

The reality is if every kid went to a public school, we'd have to significantly raise taxes to cover the additional cost (we'd also have to open new schools). I'd probably be in favour of that, but not everyone would.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

then a minute later deny them services.

Which services are they being denied?

[–] Nath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In billytheid's example, education funding.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I don't consider funding a service, but for argument's sake let's pretend it is. Those kids still have access if they attend a public school. Though I suppose that would mean they'd need to mix with the "poors", how terrible for them.

[–] foo@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Sure, they are entitled to funding. At a public school.