this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
1420 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

800 readers
35 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 93 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Inb4 you can only browse the internet with Chromium.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 82 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Well, the engineers say it themselves: nothing would prevent websites developers to prevent access from browsers that do not support this "Web DRM".

My biggest fear though is that it becomes a standard which all browsers will have to support to stay relevant. And with Google building the engine used by the vast majority of browsers, they can force this upon other browser engines (ie. Safari and Firefox).

[–] sab@kbin.social 107 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's such a potent example why everyone who cares need to stop using Chromium based browsers before it's too late. Stunts like this would be much harder to pull if there wasn't a de facto browser monopoly.

[–] Landrin201@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

It's such a potent example of why we need antitrust laws to actually be applied to tech companies.

But our government here in the US is both run by geriatric idiots who don't even know how to use a computer let alone regulate one and also is bought out by these companies.

This is a blatant, out in the open anti-competitive action that is suggested in this article and it shouldn't legally be allowed to stand, but our politicians understand so little about how technology works that they'll blindly accept Google telling them that it isn't monopolistic rather than actually try to understand it.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

All they need is a few major sites and tools requiring it to domino everything on the internet. Suddenly it's standard.

Most businesses all use either chrome or Microsoft. And they're both Chromium.

[–] Cube6392 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Literally just applying it to YouTube would send tremors throughout the internet. If YouTube stopped working in Safari or Firefox, anyone using those browsers who don't really care and just liked those browsers for other reasons will give them up and go to a chromium based browser.

Google is fighting an apathy battle. One they know they can probably win because they own the Internet's favorite content hub

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 years ago

It makes sense that they have YouTube in their sights for DRM lockdown.

[–] brombek@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Google will just say that pages with DRM will rank higher in their search and it's all done.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's time to fork the community internet off the corporate one. Set up our own DRM-free sites and our own search engines, run by open source software. With blackjack and hookers.

[–] KSPAtlas@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We kinda have the small web (Gemini & Gopher), but it is a different, much simpler format than html (Gopher is literally plaintext)

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 years ago

I remember gopher but I haven't used it for about 30 years. Does anyone still use that?

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Doesn't Firefox support DRM? I know on netacad.com it prompts me to enable it, or rather on a CCNA course. Or is it something else?

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What you are mentioning is media DRM (think Netflix, Spotify). This is something entirely different: a mechanism to ensure the entire content of a web page is not tempered with.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago
[–] 001100010010@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Please drink verification can

[–] Rolive@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

ERROR! Piracy detected!

[–] fistac0rpse@kbin.social 16 points 2 years ago

I have exceeding low expectations, but I would hope that would be grounds for an antitrust lawsuit against Google as Chromium browsers account for roughly 70% of all users (based on numbers I pulled from Wikipedia)

[–] fearout@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Subscription-based, restricted to verified accounts Chromium, that shares your personally identifiable public key with each website you visit.
Shudders

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

It makes such complete sense for Google and Microsoft that it's a wonder we didn't see it coming sooner.

[–] argv_minus_one 8 points 2 years ago

Not just Chromium, but the proprietary binary Chrome. Chromium can still be modified to block ads.