this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37633 readers
14 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If itโ€™s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if theyโ€™re wrong, or use a Linux distro you donโ€™t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Mersampa 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes! It's who you ask when you aren't sure what the idea, concept, or term is. Once you are armed with that information, use a proper search engine.

[โ€“] SolarSailer 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, another use that I know I'll be using it for (or at least Bing's Chat) will be summarizing large documents (especially in the sense of becoming a more informed voter).

I don't have time to read through the thousands of pages of legalese that our lawmakers come up with. But instead of having to wait or only rely on summaries from others I can run it through an AI to give summaries of each section and then read into anything that piques my interest.

It might be interesting to even train a smaller LLM that does this more efficiently.

The next step would be a LLM that pays more attention to unintended consequences of laws due to the way they're written. But for something really effective I imagine that would require the assistance of a large number of experts in the field... And/Or a lot of research on laws being overturned, loopholes fixed, etc.

Even then it's important that we understand that these tools are far from perfect. And we should question results rather than accepting them at face value.