this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37722 readers
55 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If- y'all have never seen this guys channel- He worked on a lot of interesting things over at Microsoft around the 3.1/95/98/NT days.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WaterWaiver@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I always had a feeling that going to the process and using "End Process" was more effective than using "End Task" on the task list. Maybe this was a placebo?

I have so many memories of my old 98, ME and XP systems slowing to a crawl and struggling with simple things. I recently tried a beta version of Longhorn (Vista) in a VM and its weird lockups crashes gave me curious quantities of nostalgia. A sudden cold chill as I realise this is not my computer any more, it's the machine's.

[–] xtremeownage@lemmyonline.com 2 points 1 year ago

I always enjoyed the "End process tree" button, myself.

I do think, task manager has lost a bit of its original effectiveness though. Back in say, the XP days, it would literally kill any process, without hesitation.

These days, its not nearly as effective.