Lemmy Support

157 readers

1 users here now

Support / questions about Lemmy.

Matrix Space: #lemmy-space

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

dessalines@lemmy.ml

Can't enable federation and 'private instance' at the same time on 0.18.0 (nc.gnzl.cl)

submitted 1 year ago by gnzl@nc.gnzl.cl to c/lemmy_support@lemmy.ml

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I just upgraded my instance to 0.18.0 using Ansible and I had to disable the option 'Private instance' directly on the database to get the lemmy docker up and running. I assume this is an intentional change, but should it really stop Lemmy from even running?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] gnzl@nc.gnzl.cl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At least on 0.17.4, with Private Instance and Federation enabled, the comments and posts I made to remote communities were federated correctly to other instances. The change seems very intentional, as shown by the error message I got after I upgraded:

lemmy_1 | Error: LemmyError { message: Some("Cannot have both private instance and federation enabled."), inner: Cannot have both private instance and federation enabled., context: SpanTrace [] }

ncgnzlcl_lemmy_1 exited with code 1

[–] awdsns@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The check giving this error is pretty old, so it seems that you got it to work was not intentional: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/blame/63d3759c481ff2d7594d391ae86e881e2aeca56d/crates/api_common/src/utils.rs#L539

As far as I can see, 0.18 and its release candidates only added additional checks preventing such an instance to be set up in the first place.

[–] gnzl@nc.gnzl.cl 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see, thank you for the insight. According to this comment, after an instance on 0.18.0 is running one can still set it to private with federation enabled, so it seems this check is only preventing the instance from starting in that state.

[–] awdsns@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, that's what this check (and the later introduced changes) are meant for. On the reasoning why this configuration is not desired I can't comment.