this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
68 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

40 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bluGill@fedia.io 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The people saying this know nothing about construction or what innovations are needed. Humans have been building housing for thousands of years and we have learned a lot over that time. Anyone asking for a technological overhaul generally doesn't even know what we have learned and so is just going to make mistakes (sometimes deadly - there are many ways a house can kill) that someone in the industry would avoid. Generally they come up with something that costs more while being worse because they have no idea where the real problems are and so didn't optimize it.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I mean, there's lots of ways construction has changed already just in the last 20 years.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That is the other thing - there are already a lot of smart people thinking about it and making changes.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I feel like that contradicts what you said before, but I agree. Most ideas that sound good at first aren't, but some actually go the distance. That applies retrospectively, and to current startups like this.

(As pictured, in the application named, I do suspect it's the former)

Edit: Wait, this thing isn't actually that expensive, by robot standards. Hmm.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 1 points 2 months ago

The smart people thinking about construction know the real problems and are working on them. The people commenting here mostly don't know what those issues are.