this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
336 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37735 readers
45 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] QHC@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yes, it absolutely is the point. I don't think billionaires should exist, full stop. They have already dehumanized everyone but themselves, so IMO turnaround is completely fair in this situation. Starting with a very extreme demand like "eat the rich" gives us lots of room to negotiate their surrender.

In general, I agree with you. But some cases are too important and cannot be reasoned with. As an otherwise avowed pacifist, I'd put "punch a Nazi in the face" on this list of acceptable moral hypocrisy, too.

[–] skogens_ro@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You're kidding yourself if you think it's a negotiation tactic. When the revolution comes, such revisionism will get you executed by true believers.

But at least you're useful to them for the time being. Someone needs to radicalise the people who will carry out the purges.

[–] QHC@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

What revolution are you talking about? Billionaires already run the world, so the only possible option is to reverse that. In which case my position seems like it would appeal very nicely to the new ruling power.