Linux

1259 readers

102 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

What is the most visually pleasing package manager (in terminal)? (slrpnk.net)

submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Sunny@slrpnk.net to c/linux@lemmy.ml

41 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] TGhost@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Debian made me to only love apt and dpkg.

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 13 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Omg apt is like the worst UI there is.

Have a look at nala! It needs some depencies but is a huge upgrade

[–] TGhost@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Ah ah i will one day.

I clearly agree, apt is ugly and even synaptic making it better. But like i said, while ago when I used synaptic I did break my packages and I got to use dpkg and apt, to repair.

Since, I guess, I'm on a PTSD about it and now just use apt or dpkg, when using a Debian or Debian based system.

But I will listen to you, and for sure will give it a try

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Nala is an apt wrapper, it just displays stuff better, automates updates and automatically chooses the fastest mirror (thats the stuff I know)

[–] TGhost@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Normally like synaptic no ?

[–] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I dont know why a (tui) wrapper should cause stuff apt doesnt. Its likely an apt problem.

[–] TGhost@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

No that was an synaptic issue, dont remember now the specific issue,
But it didnt managed well, certainly a bug at the bad moment for me at this time XD

But hey i dont regret, i know how to manage a broken apt DB now XD. I guess.. x)

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

apt is easy to use and read. I haven't dreamed of searching for a shiny replacement because there's no problem to solve.