World News

22059 readers

1 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.

Guidelines for submissions:

Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
Social media should be a source of last resort.

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.

For US News, see the US News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Senate Republicans introduce plan to tackle student loan debt (thehill.com)

submitted 1 year ago by mjgood91 to c/news

23 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The GOP package, called the “Lowering Education Costs and Debt Act,” consists of five bills that the senators say will address the root causes of the student debt issue such as the increasing price of college and students taking out loans they can’t afford.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] milkpiss@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Was expecting this to be standard GOP garbage, but after reading... I'm actually kind of mixed on it?

The first three bills don't seem bad, but I don't think they'll have any significant impact.
The fifth bill sounds like it may have an impact, but I'm curious if experts think uncapped graduate loans are really drivers of the problem.
The fourth bill sounds the worst to me, feels like GOP trying to cut enrollment in liberal arts, disregarding that those programs are important even if the pay is not as good.

I'm not opposed to Biden's loan forgiveness, but I've always felt like it's like putting a bandaid on a chainsaw wound and won't fix the underlying problem of college being too expensive. I like to see proposals addressing that instead, and this sort of does. Wonder if there's any chance of any of these passing, though.

[–] mjgood91 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fourth bill does seem like it has the potential to have a devastating effect on mass accessibility to formal college-level education in liberal arts. Such programs would seemingly find themselves merely enrolling either the very wealthy or the very talented, who were either wealthy enough to afford the cost of American university straight-up or talented enough to receive scholarships.

Anecdotally, most of the adults that I know who are struggling with student loans as adults have undergraduates in liberal arts. I guess you could make an argument that not funding students taking such programs is a more fiscally responsible move.

[–] Rodsterlings_cig@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

The fourth bill gave me 'no child left behind' vibes. I feel like it would go exactly the same way to cut funding to smaller schools and/or prevent the development of new academic institutions.

[–] zipdog 1 points 1 year ago

I like the idea in practice. We really need to hold institutions accountable for outcomes. But, I think there's probably a better way to do this with less collateral damage on liberal arts.

Flip side, maybe we need to rethink these programs if it really isn't leading to student success.

load more comments (1 replies)