this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
481 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

106 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
481
Fuck Facists, never again (vimeo.com)
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by lulztard@feddit.de to c/europe@feddit.de
61 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

People at Bonn protesting against Nazi cunts singing Ode to Joy

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Cool so let’s not take it as fact and repeat it like it’s true.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It literally is though.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So give me the science to back it up.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You can't really be this silly. You can't ethically study this shit, it would need two groups, a control group that doesn't get desensitized by the horrible things the other group does to people. But you can personally observe the changes in people of places of authority and stress over time. There's maybe a few studies in the past, like the Stanford one, Milgram I think, that ethicists discourage.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

The Stanford prison experiment was faked mate. Guards were told to act cruel and the results were pre-written.

Biological truths such as 'x causes y in humans' needs to be backed up by some very serious science, a few choice studies from the 60s barely scratch the surface of that. Because there are a million influencing factors in each and everyone's life that can drastically change the way we respond to events.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Are you this big a wanker IRL?

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Because I don't believe simplistic statements about human behaviour as true because they sound good?

If that makes me a wanker, sure whatever floats your boat mate.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It does, it absolutely does. How do you function without simple pattern recognition?

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

How do you function believing everything you hear?

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Common sense and not waiting for science to figure out how to study abstract aspects of human nature that can't really be quantified like that.

[–] Deceptichum@kbin.social 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Wow, so you literally just take as fact things that you feel are are 'common sense'.

Okay well there's no use wasting anymore time on someone like you.

[–] Sagifurius@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

So you are that big a wanker IRL.