this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

Advent Of Code

15 readers
1 users here now

An unofficial home for the advent of code community on programming.dev!

Advent of Code is an annual Advent calendar of small programming puzzles for a variety of skill sets and skill levels that can be solved in any programming language you like.

AoC 2023

Solution Threads

M T W T F S S
1 2 3
4 5 6 7 8 9 10
11 12 13 14 15 16 17
18 19 20 21 22 23 24
25

Rules/Guidelines

Relevant Communities

Relevant Links

Credits

Icon base by Lorc under CC BY 3.0 with modifications to add a gradient

console.log('Hello World')

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Day 7: Camel Cards

Megathread guidelines

  • Keep top level comments as only solutions, if you want to say something other than a solution put it in a new post. (replies to comments can be whatever)
  • Code block support is not fully rolled out yet but likely will be in the middle of the event. Try to share solutions as both code blocks and using something such as https://topaz.github.io/paste/ , pastebin, or github (code blocks to future proof it for when 0.19 comes out and since code blocks currently function in some apps and some instances as well if they are running a 0.19 beta)

FAQ


๐Ÿ”’ Thread is locked until there's at least 100 2 star entries on the global leaderboard

๐Ÿ”“ Thread has been unlocked after around 20 mins

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] hades@lemm.ee 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think you have the same solution, basically, just the details are a bit different. I like how you handled the joker, I didn't realise you could just multiply your best streak of cards to get the best possible combination.

[โ€“] snowe@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I didn't multiply the streak, I just took the jokers and added them to the highest hand already in the list. Is that not what you did? It looked the same to me.

[โ€“] hades@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

This is what I meant, but I phrased it poorly :)

In my solution I reimplement the logic of identifying the hand value, but with the presence of joker (instead of just reusing the same logic).