this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2023
22 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
18 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Okay, so we are having a public enquiry now?

From the article, it sounds like there were a number of allegations that Johnston didn't investigate, so that makes sense.

Getting the opposition parties to agree on the head of the enquiry before it starts seems like a good idea.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] grte@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why just Chinese interference? Let's have a public inquiry and get it all out in the open. Including US interference which will be found to dwarf every other state's interference by an order of magnitude. Unless someone can point out another country that owns as much media in Canada (Postmedia, anyone?)

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The NDP is talking about increasing scope to include other states.

I'm pretty sure a foreign agent registry (of implemented properly) would cover any and all state actors.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Is it just me that cares about institutional influence and not just state influence? They're equally dangerous given the power and political associations of many of these institutions.

[–] AngryMulbear@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Expanding the scope is a stall tactic that will ensure this thing is dragged out for the next 10+ years