this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023
23 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

149 readers
10 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

On one side, climate hawks insist that given the potential scale of the energy-guzzling industry, hydrogen producers should be required to use new, nearby sources of clean electricity at the same time as production takes place, instead of tapping power already on the grid that may or may not be carbon-free. Democratic senators like Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) and Jeff Merkley (D-OR) have taken up this fight, calling on the Treasury Department to adopt robust standards proposed by environmental advocates.

Some hydrogen producers are already complying with those conditions. For instance, a $4 billion mega-project in North Texas, which expects to begin operation in 2027, is building out wind and solar resources projected to total 1.4 gigawatts—more energy than is consumed by the city of Austin. Air Products, an industrial gas producer and developer of the Texas project, is among several hydrogen producers backing the stricter rules.

But other industry groups are pushing to allow their facilities to be powered by existing energy sources on the grid, while remaining eligible for the green hydrogen production credit. They claim that producers will struggle to procure new clean electricity in states where they have now won lucrative subsidies, hobbling the nascent industry.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Spoiler alert: creating hydrogen with dirty energy makes the hydrogen dirty 💩