Mom! Bart's fissioning!
shukufuku
joined 1 year ago
Poor Skim Scott.
Kidney stones are miserable. Drink your GD water
Your 15-minutes of post-combat looting recovers...
-ten dice rolls later-
Three arrows, saving you ...
-twenty seconds of math-
0.3 copper!
Meanwhile I'll the one literally swimming in coins
Yeah, the bathroom is down the narrow stairs, turn around, teleport... fine I'll show you.
I'm disappointed that there's not E089 PROGRAMMER IS NOT BEING SINCERE
That money is still going somewhere. The donors are getting poorer and whoever is receiving the legal fees is getting more powerful.
No, you have your digital id in a database that also has a link to a picture of the precious. There is no implied ownership of the image.
You got any of them Mummies Alive! movies?
So are the institutions that are breached only criminally or civilly liable if the hackers leak protected data? Otherwise, why would they pay the ransom. It seems like they should have some liability because they didn't safeguard their data properly. I suppose they could be attempting to save their clients' trust even without a monetary penalty. If the hackers leak the data after being paid, does that matter legally? Does the amount paid or demanded affect how much of a penalty is applied?
view more: next ›
Both gram negative, I'd assume