Heresy_generator

The justification was that the land the traitors were claiming as their own belonged to America. If they wanted to stop being Americans they had every right to leave, they just had no right take parts of America with them.

The co-chairs have also asked the government to "declare its willingness to withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights and repeal the Human Rights Act"

Yikes.

And the support was just store credit, and not even that much of it in the grand scheme of things.

And it was completely a self-serving public relations play: they wanted to show that these respectable journalist organizations were willing to advertise on Xitter to try to convince some of their lost advertisers that it was okay to come back.

Fox is really doing unsubtle "post hoc ergo propter hoc" gesturing at this, huh?

As the university presidents were trying to explain to Clown Shoes, sorry, I mean Elise Stefanik: Harassment is conduct that is severe or pervasive enough to create an environment that a reasonable person would consider intimidating, hostile, or abusive. A one-time generalized statement calling for genocide not targeted at a specific individual would not usually rise to the level of harassment per se, but can certainly be part of a pattern of harassment. Similarly, actual bullying is a pattern of abusive behavior and cannot be defined by any single act as it is often used colloquially.

That's the game Stefanik is playing: She knows these universities' policies are bound by the actual, legal definitions of "harassment" and "bullying" but she's counting on her ignorant audience not knowing those definitions and instead thinking the words are defined as what they use them for in their own lives: someone being mean.

Those weren't "preoders"; that was another Telsa lie that everyone repeated uncritically. People paid $100 dollars for reservations. That does not represent a firm commitment, nor the wherewithal, to purchase a 6-figure vehicle.

Or that, again, both are about the same for support of Ukraine, with the GOP being slightly better.

What?!?

Now thinking about the rest of the world, would you say your opinion is favorable or unfavorable
towards [Ukraine]?
D: 77% favorable; 11% unfavorable
R: 60% favorable; 27% unfavorable

To what extent do you agree or disagree with the following statements?
Given the current economic climate, the United States cannot afford to be taking military action in Ukraine
D: 54%
R: 76%

The problems of Ukraine are none of our business, and we should not interfere
D: 35%
R: 54%

In your opinion, should the U.S. do any of the following in response to the current situation in Ukraine?
The United States should provide weapons to the Ukraine
D: 61% yes; 20% no
R: 34% yes; 39% no

The United States should send financial aid to Ukraine, in addition to sending weapons
D: 55% yes; 23% no
R: 20% yes; 51% no

Anyone looking for the full survey results rather than...

This article was published in Fars News Agency and is re published here under a creative commons license.

the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps' take on it (wow; what a choice) can find it here.

ANNs like this will always just present our own biases and stereotypes back to us unless the data is scrubbed and curated in a way that no one is going to spend the resources to. Things like this are a good demonstration of why they need to be kept far, far away from decision making processes.

Even though Netanyahu is Jewish, he knows using (and in this case abusing) the Christian bible

He's citing the Hebrew Bible.

Musk clarified, “When I say payments, I actually mean someone’s entire financial life. If it involves money. It’ll be on our platform. Money or securities or whatever. So, it’s not just like send $20 to my friend. I’m talking about, like, you won’t need a bank account.” Musk’s remarks were obtained from an audio recording of the meeting.

Don't use regulated banks and securities brokers, just give all your money and securities to Elon Musk's new unregulated shadow bank / broker that used to be a functioning social media platform to look after! This sounds a lot like Sam Bankman-Fried's pitch to investors about FTX* and Elon is about as trustworthy as Sam, right? I mean, close to it; Elon isn't that much more untrustworthy than Sam. What could go wrong?

*“I want FTX to be a place where you can do anything you want with your next dollar. You can buy bitcoin. You can send money in whatever currency to any friend anywhere in the world. You can buy a banana. You can do anything you want with your money from inside FTX” ~ SBF

So.... [people don't actually like our products but we maintain dominance by leveraging our market position in every way we can.]

Yeah. That's why you're here.