this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
170 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

106 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

This is the wrong statistic! It doesnt matter how often you take the train, but how far you go. There is something called a passenger kilometer. Someone traveling one kilometer by train makes one passenger kilometer, 6 people on a train going 10 kilometers makes 60 passenger kilometers. The same can be done for other modes of transportation. The modal split (the right statistic) then shows how much each mode of transportation is actually used. Here you can find the statistic for each country of the EU: https://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/daviz/passenger-transport-modal-split-2#tab-chart_1

A few examples why modal split is better than frequencies:

  • Environmentally CO2 is emitted per kilometer. Someone may bike a short distance everyday to work, but visits his parents who live far away every weekend by car.
  • On the way to work someone could take the car and the train on the same commute.
[–] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

Switzerland is also on top for person-kilometres.

[–] Paul_279@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Germany, would be better in Case you would measure the time that it takes to travel.

Danks ju fΓΆr traffeling Wiss Deutsche Bahn ...

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even that has problems. German railways might not be on time, but most of the main lines are upgraded to 200km/h and some new lines are even faster. So compared to for example Switzerland that means higher speed, but it is much more likely to be delayed.

[–] Paul_279@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

The main reasons of which the German trains are mostly to late are Not enough Tracks for all the trains and Not enough people who works at Deutsche Bahn.

If we would like that more people taking the train, we need also more acces to trains, that means more trainstations in villages Connected to the railway systhem

[–] Spzi@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

Interesting! For example, while Switzerland and Turkey appear on opposite sides of the spectrum in OP, they are close to each other in the modal split. And Turkey has even much less car use than Switzerland! 61.6% vs 77.7%. Apparently, taking the bus is very common in Turkey. With 36.6% more than any other country has in train and bus combined.

And while Germany looks literally green in the upper half in OP, modal split shows it's car dependency with 85.4%.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most people have far more km to work every day than the longer trips to visit distant relatives. Thus how often you take the train is a useful metric.

Plus someone who drives to work.already has a car so the marginal cost of the longer trip is insignificant. While someone who normally doesn't drive has to make up the costs of a car for rare trips only and that makes the marginal cost of a car very high. So people who don't drive daily are more likely to figure out how to take those long trips without a car.

[–] julianwgs@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This pattern is true and passenger kilometers represent it just fine. There is no need to use the how often you use the train metric. Note that my two examples were there to explain the metric, not actual factual examples.

As an actual example: I take my bike to work and dont own a car, so my modal split is mostly trains because of longer distance trips, but I use the bike far more often. Frequencies only make sense if each occurrence is very similar (in quantity). For example: How often does one eat meat? Each meal roughly contains the same amount of meat (may be factor two or three difference). Here frequencies make more sense as more detailed statistics dont actually give more insights.

[–] bluGill@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

The most useful metric for a transit system is % of people who are on a monthly unlimited rides pass. So long as the pass is priced well that measures who useful transit is.

Of course for people who bike an unlimited rides pass may not be cost effective, but I still like it as people who are on the pass won't hesitate to use transit for odd trips.

[–] jojo 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The Netherlands is very much missing from this

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

My thoughts as well. There is a ton of train commuting within the Randstad for example. My girlfriend's company has a surprising number of people who do a daily commute from Rotterdam to Amsterdam as well as places like Den Haag and Haarlem.

If you look at the stats here, The Netherlands ranks 7th nationally for % of trips taken by rail and only Austria and Switzerland are ahead of it out of western European countries.

It also ranks very highly for passenger kilometers which is saying a lot because the country is small as shit, most of the people are packed into an area about 1/3 the size of Belgium, and the overall population is fairly small when compared to places like Spain, France, Italy, and Germany.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_rail_usage

[–] KrokanteBamischijf@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a strange drop-off where train travel gets significantly worse for longer distances though.

Commuting within the Randstad, and to a certain degree the provinces of Flevoland, Gelderland and Noord-Brabant is pretty compelling because the network is well connected. Need to get anywhere else though and the benefits of train travel over commuting by car start to disappear quickly.

This also ties into the fact that our public transit is by far the most expensive in the EU (and possibly even worldwide). Which makes traveling by train really only a viable option if you have the money to spare or your employer covers your travel expenses.

A pretty standard daily commute can cost upwards of €20 per round trip, which comes down to nearly a fifth of a minimum wage budget after taxes. That doesn't well with a housing crisis.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I do agree the pricing sucks and it's got its shortcomings.

We almost always rent one of those Greenwheels cars to see my girlfriend's folks who live in a smaller town because the alternative is an ordeal. Also we have repeatedly gotten stranded in Haarlem after a night of drinking because the train cuts off surprisingly early (something like 1:30am? I can't remember). Fortunately our place is on the west side of Amsterdam so the Uber is fairly cheap, but it's pretty annoying.

The country could certainly stand to put more money into transit.

[–] Wirrvogel@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I fully understand not wanting to use a train in Greece.
https://www.dw.com/en/greece-train-crash-government-admits-decades-of-failure/a-64864913

A probe into the tragedy would focus on the "chronic delays in implementing railway works, delays caused by chronic public sector malaise and decades of failure," government spokesman Yiannis Economou told reporters in Athens.

That said, I feel all European countries, maybe except of Switzerland, have failed to proper care for their rail infrastructure and missed the chance to convince more people to travel with trains instead of cars. :(

[–] iByteABit@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correction: trains in Greece are no longer public sector. They are all owned by Ferrovie dello stato italiane, the failure of setting up failsafes and maintenance are because it wasn't profitable enough to do so.

[–] bob_lemon@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

https://www.euronews.com/next/2023/09/22/riding-the-rails-which-country-travels-the-most-by-train-in-europe

Here's the article this image arms to be based on, which includes many more counties.

[–] vinhill@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

Finland is missing

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That looks like bullshit. Or it's at least missing some data. Czechia, by the very nature of being in the middle of Europe, we have the densest train network which in turn means our trains go even to the smallest of shitholes and it's very common to take a train somewhere.

[–] ToxicWaste@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

This does not seem to be true. According to Wikipedia the Czech Republic has 9567 km of railways. This leaves them with a density of 0.121299336891 Railway/kmΒ².

Switzerland, which was listed as the densest in the Article, has 5317 km of railways. This leaves them with a density of 0.128787695288 Railway/kmΒ².

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_rail_transport_network_size

Keep in mind, that the dates of the data collection are 3 years apart (Czechia 2017, Switzerland 2020).

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What do European country are you from?

France, Germany, EU, Sweden

All are countries in the EU

[–] lud@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

It's obviously referring to the EU average.

This is very common in European and EU graphs. In statistics with countries world wide, it's common to see "World" (and sometimes also "EU") as an entry

[–] IoSapsai@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

As a train traveler in Bulgaria (absent from this statistic but present in the one posted in the comments), I can vouch for our low rates of train commute (still 3 times higher than Greece) The car culture is going strong with everyone using their own vehicle. A lot of places are barely reachable by bus and unreachable by train. It takes longer and there are delays. The security is questionable with creeps causing trouble fairly often, despite police always being present. It's rather dirty, the trains are mostly Soviet era. We can't talk about air conditioning, only open windows (which you prop open with an item that you're not afraid to lose) and scorching radiators.

Despite all that I love commuting by train. I can sit comfortably, stretch, walk around, use the (very poor) toilet if needed. I can cross stitch when creeps don't try to talk to me, I try to sit around grannies that take interest at most. It's cheap, you can go from the coast to Sofia in about 7 hours for 15 euros, half if you have a card. It's easier to talk with the person I'm traveling with. The scenery of rural Bulgaria is absolutely beautiful, and best of all - No motion sickness!

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this seems to somewhat correlate with cold.

[–] nicetriangle@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also the economy to some extent which would make sense because rail infrastructure is not cheap

[–] lud@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I would say to a bigger extent than climate. Population density is also important.

[–] SmashnBen@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

My country has 0 trains.