this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
161 points (100.0% liked)

World News

1036 readers
17 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This will be the straw that breaks the camel's back for me.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 79 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

According to the comments, I might be the only person on earth that subscribed to Prime exclusively for their shipping.

PS: 🏴‍☠️

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I am with you. Their streaming service was always subpar to competitors. In fact, I watched only one series there -the expanse, and that’s it.

[–] rynzcycle@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

God forgive me, I'm going defend Prime. I always thought that because Prime was also required for faster shipping, they were willing to explore artistic shows that something like Netflix wouldn't touch these days. People likely aren't subscribing or cancelling because of the video offer, so they have more freedom to greenlight interesting concepts.

Prime shows like Solos and Tales from the Loop probably aren't great for getting new subscribers, but they're absolutely wonderful, especially compared to season 47 of [generic low-budget comedy baking reality show]. Shows like The Expanse, Mr Robot, Homecoming are all solid and Prime seems far less likely to cancel shows before they end properly.

I'm going to add onto that The Boys and Invincible. Ya I agree that it's probably one of the better ones.

[–] bermuda 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I loved what the grand tour was able to accomplish on prime that they simply couldn't on BBC with top gear. The early seasons are wonky with weird formatting, but when they started focusing more on specials in the later seasons (seamen, eurocrash, the Mongolian special, a massive hunt) have been some of the best top gear content since like top gear season 7

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm almost impressed by how bad their UI is. It's like they didn't even try to create something useful, but simply shoehorned it into the regular Amazon codebase.

The only service with worse UI is Sky, and if Sky is your benchmark, than you're done.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I so much agree. I would never go to Amazon service to buy new movies (for streaming). It is not easy to see what is in your library and sort/search it.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I pay $0 for my streaming service, and it has everything i want on it. Yaaaaarrrrrr

[–] drlecompte@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Paper Girls is pretty good too.

[–] Fester@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we had Prime before streaming even started, so that was like a bonus.

But lately we hardly use it. The site is so janky and bloated with trash, I’d rather pay shipping and buy directly from a brand website or a normal retailer. Most have free shipping nowadays anyway.

I just bought an Apple USB wall adapter from Amazon because Best Buy was out of them. I spent like 20 minutes inspecting it and the package and watching videos about how to make sure it isn’t counterfeit. Buying a $20 thing shouldn’t be a stressful ordeal.

[–] GeekFTW@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Naw, I was too. Haven't been for a year or two, but I've only ever subscribed to them for the shipping. Barely used their streaming when I did cause, also, yarr 🏴‍☠️

[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine for a second you were a paid member of a gym, but decided to do most of your exercise outside the gym you just paid for.

That's most streaming platforms for a large amount of people. They're so inconvenient that people will pay for them, and still not use the service they paid for.

A damning indictment of modern day streaming platforms tbh.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

the music is a more significant boost to the shipping than the video.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

We just write down things we need to get from Amazon, then wait until they give us another free trial month of Prime and do it all at once lol.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 60 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And piracy is yet again the superior experience.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 1 year ago

I started pirating their shows, even though I pay for prime. Their UX is just so absolutely bad, that it was easier to use torrents

[–] kayjay@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago

Haven’t paid for a streaming service since 2020. Piracy proves yet again to be the only real option.

[–] bquintb@midwest.social 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Welp, back to the high seas....

🎶Do what you want cuz a pirate is free, You.Are.A.Pirate!🎶

[–] BillTheTailor@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

And execs wonder why we torrent.

[–] ulkesh 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time to buy more hard drives for my Plex server.

[–] nova_ad_vitum@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're selfhosting then you should consider Jellyfin. It does all the important stuff Plex does without the ever-increasing bloat as they try to monetize it.

[–] ulkesh 9 points 1 year ago

I’ve run a Plex server for over a decade. It just works and the barrier to entry for family is extremely low. I’ll keep using Plex for now.

[–] Digital_Prophet@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yaaar, we had ourselves a good run goin' legit, mateys, but it looks like it be time to hoist the jolly roger again.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

I guess we arrived at the giant whirlpool fight vs the East India Trading Company in Pirates of the Caribbean pt. 3

[–] SighBapanada@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

You mean I get to pay for the privilege of watching your ads? Wow thank you so much amazon how could I be so lucky wow I am not worthy

[–] fernandocarletti@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It already forces you to watch many trailers anyways ahahaha

[–] marco 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You can skip those trailers... don't think that will work with those ads.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

paying is fine, and free with ads is fine, but pay to see ads. no thank you.

[–] fisco@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Will be cancelling prime, little used anyway, but kept it going.... this latest news, is the impetus to ditch it... thanks Amazon..

[–] UsedChicken@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Guess I’ll be pirating their shows then

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you subscribe to other channels via Amazon Prime (e.g., Paramount+ through the Prime app), they already serve you 70-90s unskippable ads. Often ads for the very show you are about to watch. It's infuriating.

If I were paying for it myself it would be totally unacceptable. Since I'm just using someone else's account, it still makes me mad but I'll tolerate it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Amazon is set to introduce adverts to its Prime Video streaming service in 2024 as it seeks to put more cash into creating TV shows and films.

UK Prime customers, along with those in the US, Germany and Canada, will see ads early next year unless they subscribe for an "ad-free" option at an additional cost.

At the moment, a Prime subscription, which includes free one-day delivery on goods as well as access to its streaming service, costs £8.99 per month, or £95 a year, in the UK.

The company said it would get in touch with Prime members a few weeks before ads are introduced to show how to sign-up for the ad-free option if they wish to.

Live event broadcasts, like sports matches, will still include adverts even for those who sign up to the ad-free option.

Data previously released by analysts Kantar showed that people cut back on video streaming services in their droves last year as they sought out different ways to deal with the spike in the cost of living.


The original article contains 398 words, the summary contains 175 words. Saved 56%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I canceled it at the beginning of the year. Im not missing anything and I try to diversify the stores I purchase from.

The only thing that sucks is when I HAVE to use amazon for something. They will nag you so hard to get prime. It only makes me avoid them even more.

[–] theKalash@feddit.ch 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Why would you HAVE to use amazon?

[–] Gott@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

There have been many items I've looked at or bought, mostly from small-ish manufacturers, that are only available through amazon due to the manufacturer not have the resources to handle all the logistics and web store that come with selling through amazon. I do everything I can to avoid buying from them because I can't stand their bull shit.

[–] whitepawn@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you live remote, say, an hour or more from real shopping and such it’s the way to get fast delivery on anything, though Walmart does ok with this, though their “fast” is fairly unreliable. (Great for front door delivery of kitty litter, dog food, etc)

But no, most people don’t need it because most people don’t live remote.

[–] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Wal-Mart’s not really any better than Amazon

[–] Pechente@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The fast shipping. Need something the next day? -> Amazon. No other online store can match how fast they are in my area.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scytale@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The only time I had amazon prime was a free trial.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is something that I really don’t get. Aren’t we close to critical advertisement mass by now? With all the silly advertising at this point, Amazon, for example, must be advertising on Disney+, while Disney+ is advertising on Netflix.

[–] FaeDrifter@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago

Advertising going up, prices going up, quality going down, consumer disposable income going down.

Plus the writer and actor strikes that are going to hit content releases hard once they finished releasing already-finished content.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ExLisper@linux.community 3 points 1 year ago

Dude, the time to ditch Amazon as a whole was like 10 years ago.

[–] LoafyLemon@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I will be switching from Amazon Prime to RealDebrid. It's cheaper, and the service seems better. 🏴‍☠️

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
[–] MrPhibb@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

We were already leaning towards replacing it with WalMart+ before this announcement. It used to be worth it when it was cheaper and got you next day delivery, but those are gone. We have little use for it's various features, so we figure give W+ a try for a year, it's cheaper, and seems to cover our needs, though there's a good chance that'll be a one and done thing, since I don't think we'll find it worth it, but I don't see us going back to Prime.

[–] Jabbawacky@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Yep. I'm moving this month and not renewing.

[–] Unaware7013@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Even though I have prime, I think I've used their video service like 2 or 4 times. The interface is shit and the included media was sub par the vast majority of the time unless I wanted to pay to watch something that wasn't included.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›