I know there's going to be some answers telling me maybe not to use a singleton, but the alternative of passing a vector all around throughout my code is not ergonmic at all.

I've tried lots of things, but this is where I'm at right now. Specifically I'm just having trouble initializing it.

`/**

LOG_CELL
Stores a vec of Strings that is added to throughout the algorithm with information to report
To the end user and developer */ pub static LOG_CELL: OnceLock<&mut Vec> = OnceLock::new();

pub fn set_log() { LOG_CELL.set(Vec::new()); }

pub fn push_log(message: String) { if let Some(vec_of_messages) = LOG_CELL.get() { let something = *vec_of_messages; something.push(message); } } `

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] pranaless 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

OnceLock is the wrong primitive for this. Use a Mutex or an RwLock instead? You can initialize either of them with an empty array at declaration, so you don't need the set_log function. In push_log, do a .lock().unwrap() for a mutex or .write().unwrap() for an rwlock to get mutable access to the vector.

[–] nerdblood@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Nice, thanks... looking into these now.

[–] ActuallyRuben@actuallyruben.nl 2 points 2 years ago

Can't you just use the get_or_init method instead of get inside the push_log method? This would initialize the cell on first use. You'd still need a Mutex inside of it to acquire a mutable reference to the vector.